State Office Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House-1 Steve Scalise R 100%
LA U.S. House-2 Cedric Richmond D 20%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. R 80%
LA State Senate-1 A. Crowe, Jr. R 86%
LA State Senate-3 Jean-Paul Morrell D 19%
LA State Senate-4 Edwin Murray D 19%
LA State Senate-5 Karen Peterson D 23%
LA State Senate-8 John Alario, Jr. R 47%
LA State Senate-10 Daniel Martiny R 88%
LA State Senate-12 Ben Nevers, Sr. D 31%
LA State Senate-13 Dale Erdey R 71%
LA State Senate-14 Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb D 25%
LA State Senate-15 Sharon Broome D 33%
LA State Senate-19 Gary Smith, Jr. D 56%
LA State Senate-25 Dan Morrish R 94%
LA State Senate-27 Ronnie Johns R 100%
LA State Senate-28 Eric LaFleur D 75%
LA State Senate-29 Richard Gallot, Jr. D 34%
LA State Senate-30 John Smith R 31%
LA State Senate-33 Michael Walsworth R 100%
LA State Senate-34 Francis Thompson D 69%
LA State Senate-39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. D 24%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. R 79%
LA Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry Michael Strain R 84%
LA Mayor-At-Large Mitch Landrieu D 27%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. D 28%
Ernest Alexander 100%
Rodney Alexander 94%
Glenn Ansardi 46%
Diana Bajoie 21%
Damon Baldone 75%
Robert Barham 90%
Clara Baudoin 19%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 20%
Ronald Bean 89%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 24%
Shirley Bowler 94%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 36%
Emile Bruneau 94%
James Cain 47%
Robert Carter 19%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 69%
Joel Chaisson II 70%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 90%
Carl Crane 100%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 11%
Israel Curtis 8%
N. J. Damico 94%
William Daniel IV 100%
Carla Dartez 97%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 90%
Emma Devillier 45%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 50%
John Diez 83%
Jean Doerge 44%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 88%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 75%
Sydnie Mae Durand 81%
Noble Ellington 80%
Rick Farrar 38%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 57%
Cleo Fields 18%
Wilson Fields 22%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 81%
Heulette Fontenot 80%
Mickey Frith 87%
Gregory Lee Fruge 94%
Mike Futrell 100%
Butch Gautreaux 75%
Cedric Bradford Glover 17%
Kyle Mark Green 33%
Elcie Guillory 26%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 67%
Alexander Heaton 53%
Troy Hebert 81%
Francis Heitmeier 26%
Herman Ray Hill 31%
Donald Hines 25%
Melvin Lee Holden 21%
Ken Hollis 70%
Roy Hopkins 53%
Fred Hoyt 90%
Charles Irvin Hudson 25%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 19%
Nita Hutter 71%
Kay Iles 33%
Paulette Riley Irons 29%
Lydia Jackson 19%
Michael Jackson 27%
Jon Johnson 44%
Bill Jones 65%
Charles Jones 20%
Kay Katz 97%
Donald Kennard 96%
Lelon Kenney 90%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 28%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 100%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 93%
Arthur Lentini 82%
Leonard Lucas, Jr. 17%
Max Malone 100%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 44%
Jay Bowen McCallum 88%
Charles McDonald 88%
Joe McPherson 7%
Thomas McVea 50%
Michael Michot 100%
Billy Montgomery 26%
Willie Mount 30%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 13%
Anthony Richard Perkins 88%
Wilfred Pierre 28%
Gillis Pinac 27%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 100%
Henry Powell 78%
Renee Gill Pratt 13%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 25%
Charles Riddle III 56%
Craig Romero 70%
Errol Romero 72%
Joe Salter 69%
Matthew Schneider III 100%
Melinda Schwegmann 41%
B.L. Shaw 88%
Jack Smith 88%
Jane Smith 80%
Kenneth Smith 70%
Jennifer Sneed 94%
Victor Stelly 100%
Patrick Swilling 33%
Gerald Theunissen 70%
Jerry Thomas 74%
Joseph Toomy 93%
Thomas Townsend 28%
Warren Triche, Jr. 75%
Jim Tucker 100%
J. Chris Ullo 70%
Wayne Waddell 84%
Diane Winston 94%
Ernest Wooton 59%
Thomas Wright 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.