Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Academy of Emergency Medicine

2005-2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 50%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 50%
Todd Akin 50%
Rodney Alexander 50%
Wayne Allard 50%
Thomas Allen 50%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 50%
Brian Baird 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 50%
J. Gresham Barrett 50%
Roscoe Bartlett 50%
Max Baucus 50%
Evan Bayh 50%
Melissa Bean 50%
Bob Bennett 50%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 50%
Jeff Bingaman 50%
Kit Bond 50%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 50%
Mary Bono Mack 50%
Dan Boren 100%
Leonard Boswell 0%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 100%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ginny Brown-Waite 50%
Jim Bunning 50%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 50%
Robert Byrd 50%
Chris Cannon 50%
Eric Cantor 50%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Russ Carnahan 50%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 100%
Ben Chandler III 50%
Hillary Clinton 50%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 50%
Larry Craig 50%
Robert Cramer 100%
Barbara Cubin 50%
Artur Davis 50%
Geoff Davis 50%
Jo Ann Davis 50%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 50%
James DeMint 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Norm Dicks 50%
Chris Dodd 50%
Elizabeth Dole 50%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 50%
John Doolittle 50%
Byron Dorgan 50%
Thelma Drake 50%
David Dreier 50%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 100%
Philip English 50%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Terry Everett 50%
Tom Feeney 50%
Russ Feingold 50%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 50%
Elton Gallegly 50%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 50%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 50%
Bart Gordon 100%
Judd Gregg 50%
Jane Harman 50%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Robert Hayes 50%
Wally Herger, Jr. 50%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 50%
Maurice Hinchey 50%
David Lee Hobson 50%
Pete Hoekstra 50%
Thomas Holden 100%
Darlene Hooley 50%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 50%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 50%
Daniel Inouye 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 50%
Tim Johnson 0%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 50%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 50%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 50%
Joseph Knollenberg 50%
Herb Kohl 50%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
John Kuhl, Jr. 50%
Jon Kyl 50%
Ray LaHood 50%
Tom Lantos 50%
Steve LaTourette 50%
Frank Lautenberg 50%
Jerry Lewis 50%
Ron Lewis 50%
Joe Lieberman 50%
Blanche Lincoln 50%
John Linder 50%
Trent Lott, Sr. 50%
Dick Lugar 100%
Dan Lungren 50%
Connie Mack IV 50%
Don Manzullo 50%
Jim Marshall 50%
Melquiades Martinez 50%
Thaddeus McCotter 50%
James McCrery III 50%
John McHugh 50%
Michael McNulty 50%
Martin Meehan 50%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 50%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 50%
Brad Miller 50%
Alan Mollohan 50%
Dennis Moore 50%
Jack Murtha 100%
Marilyn Musgrave 50%
Sue Myrick 50%
Ben Nelson 0%
Jim Oberstar 50%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 50%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 50%
Ron Paul 100%
Donald Payne 50%
John Peterson 50%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 100%
Todd Platts 100%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 50%
Deborah Pryce 50%
George Radanovich 50%
James Ramstad 100%
Ralph Regula 50%
Denny Rehberg 50%
Richard Renzi 100%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 50%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 50%
Ken Salazar 50%
Jim Saxton 50%
Jean Schmidt 0%
John Shadegg 50%
Christopher Shays 50%
Ike Skelton 50%
Gordon Smith 100%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 50%
Hilda Solis 50%
Mark Souder 50%
Arlen Specter 100%
John Spratt, Jr. 50%
Pete Stark 50%
Cliff Stearns 100%
Ted Stevens 50%
Bart Stupak 50%
John Sullivan 50%
John Sununu 50%
Tom Tancredo 50%
John Tanner 50%
Ellen Tauscher 50%
Gene Taylor 100%
Craig Thomas 50%
Todd Tiahrt 50%
Ed Towns 50%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 50%
George Voinovich 50%
James Walsh 50%
Zach Wamp 50%
John Warner 100%
Diane Watson 50%
Mel Watt 50%
Anthony Weiner 50%
David Weldon 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top