Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Libertarian Party

1995 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Edmond Spencer Abraham 40%
Gary Ackerman 10%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 50%
Wayne Allard 40%
Rob Andrews 20%
Bill Archer 80%
Richard Armey 70%
John Ashcroft 60%
Henry Scott Baesler 10%
Richard Hugh Baker 10%
William Baker 30%
Cass Ballenger 70%
James Barcia 30%
Bob Barr, Jr. 20%
Bill Barrett 70%
Roscoe Bartlett 20%
Charlie Bass 60%
Herbert Bateman 30%
Max Baucus 40%
Anthony Beilenson 80%
Bob Bennett 60%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 10%
Douglas Bereuter 50%
Howard Berman 60%
Tom Bevill 10%
Brian Bilbray 10%
Michael Bilirakis 20%
Jeff Bingaman 60%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 70%
Peter Blute 40%
Sherwood Boehlert 30%
Kit Bond 40%
Henry Bonilla 70%
David Edward Bonior 80%
Sonny Bono 50%
Robert Borski, Jr. 10%
Rick Boucher 20%
Bill Bradley 40%
John Breaux 40%
Bill Brewster 30%
Glen Browder 10%
George Brown, Jr. 80%
Hank Brown 50%
Richard Bryan 30%
Ed Bryant 90%
John Bryant 10%
Dale Bumpers 30%
Jim Bunn 60%
Jim Bunning 20%
Conrad Burns 50%
Dan Burton 20%
Steve Buyer 20%
Robert Byrd 30%
Herbert Callahan 20%
Ben Campbell 40%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 0%
Mike Castle 20%
John Chafee 60%
Jim Chapman 30%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 50%
Jon Lynn Christensen 90%
Dick Chrysler 40%
William Clay, Sr. 10%
Eva Clayton 10%
Robert Clement 20%
William Clinger 40%
William Cohen 50%
Ronald Coleman 20%
Barbara-Rose Collins 10%
Cardiss Collins 80%
Michael Collins 20%
Larry Combest 80%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 40%
Wes Cooley 80%
Jerry Costello 30%
Paul Coverdell 30%
Christopher Cox 30%
William Coyne 10%
Larry Craig 60%
Robert Cramer 20%
Philip Crane 20%
Frank Arnold Cremeans 70%
Barbara Cubin 70%
Randall Cunningham 30%
Alfonse D'Amato 40%
Patsy Ann Danner 30%
Thomas Daschle 40%
Thomas Davis III 50%
E. Kika de la Garza 20%
Thomas DeLay 70%
Ronald Dellums 90%
Peter Deutsch 40%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Jay Dickey 30%
Norm Dicks 10%
Julian Dixon 70%
Chris Dodd 50%
Robert Dole 40%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 40%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 40%
Byron Dorgan 40%
Robert Dornan 20%
David Dreier 30%
Jennifer Dunn 60%
Chet Edwards 30%
Vern Ehlers 20%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 40%
Bill Emerson 60%
Philip English 40%
John Ensign 80%
Lane Evans 80%
Terry Everett 20%
Thomas Ewing 20%
Jim Exon 30%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 50%
Harris Fawell 20%
Victor Fazio 70%
Russ Feingold 70%
Cleo Fields 50%
Jack Fields, Jr. 80%
Bob Filner 70%
Floyd Flake 10%
Michael Patrick Flanagan 30%
Thomas Foglietta 10%
Mark Foley 40%
Michael Patrick Forbes 60%
Harold Ford, Sr. 10%
Wendell Ford 30%
Tillie Fowler 10%
Jon David Fox 80%
Barney Frank 70%
Gary Franks 30%
Robert Franks 50%
Dan Frisa 80%
William Frist 40%
Jonas Frost III 20%
David Funderburk 80%
Elizabeth Furse 10%
Elton Gallegly 20%
John Ganske 20%
Sam Gejdenson 70%
George Gekas 60%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 10%
Pete Geren 50%
Sam Gibbons 60%
Wayne Gilchrest 60%
Paul Gillmor 80%
Benjamin Gilman 50%
Newt Gingrich 0%
John Glenn 50%
Henry Gonzalez 0%
William Goodling 60%
Bart Gordon 20%
Slade Gorton 20%
Porter Goss 10%
Daniel Graham 60%
William Phillip Gramm 50%
Rodney Grams 50%
Enid Greene 80%
James Greenwood 60%
Judd Gregg 40%
Steven Gunderson 50%
Gilbert Gutknecht 90%
Tony Hall 10%
Lee Hamilton 30%
Melton Hancock 90%
James Hansen 80%
Jane Harman 30%
J. Dennis Hastert 10%
Mark Hatfield 30%
James Hayes 40%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 30%
Joel Hefley 20%
W.G. Hefner 10%
Fredrick Kenneth Fred' Heineman 60%
Jesse Helms 50%
Wally Herger, Jr. 20%
Van Hilleary 80%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 90%
Maurice Hinchey 10%
David Lee Hobson 60%
Pete Hoekstra 40%
Martin Hoke 60%
Thomas Holden 20%
Ernest Hollings 50%
Stephen Horn 40%
John Nathan Hostettler 20%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Duncan Hunter 20%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 20%
Kay Hutchison 50%
Henry Hyde 10%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 80%
Daniel Inouye 60%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 70%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 60%
James Merrill Jeffords 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top