Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NARAL Pro-Choice Montana

2003 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 100%
MT State House 3 Jerry O'Neil Republican 0%
MT State House 96 Carolyn Squires Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 2 Dee Brown Republican 0%
MT State Senate 5 Verdell Jackson Republican 0%
MT State Senate 9 Rick Ripley Republican 0%
MT State Senate 15 Jim Peterson Republican 0%
MT State Senate 16 Jonathan Windy Boy Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 23 Alan Olson Republican 0%
MT State Senate 32 Larry Jent Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 34 Scott Sales Republican 0%
MT State Senate 36 Debby Barrett Republican 0%
MT State Senate 38 Jim Keane Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 41 Christine Kaufmann Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 42 Dave Lewis Republican 0%
MT State Senate 45 Fred Thomas Republican 0%
MT State Senate 48 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 49 David Wanzenried Democratic 100%
MT Justice of the Supreme Court Seat 2 Mike Wheat Non-partisan 100%
MT Auditor Monica Lindeen Democratic 100%
MT Council Member Ward 1 Brent Cromley Democratic 100%
MT Public Service Commission Vice Chair Bob Lake Republican 0%
Joan Andersen 0%
Sherm Anderson 0%
Keith Bales 0%
Norman Ballantyne 33%
Joe Balyeat 0%
Gregory Barkus 0%
Arlene Becker 100%
Bob Bergren 100%
Rodney Bitney 0%
Norma Bixby 100%
Jerry Black 0%
John Bohlinger 50%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 0%
Gary Branae 100%
Roy Brown 0%
John Brueggeman 0%
Edward Butcher 0%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
Terrence Callahan 100%
Eileen Carney 100%
Edith Clark 0%
Paul Clark 66%
John Cobb 100%
Vicki Cocchiarella 100%
Jill Cohenour 100%
Mike Cooney 100%
Aubyn Curtiss 0%
Larry Cyr 100%
Robert DePratu 0%
Ronald Devlin 0%
Sue Dickenson 100%
Tim Dowell 100%
Jon Ellingson 100%
Jim Elliott 100%
Ron Erickson 100%
John Esp 0%
George Loren Everett 0%
Stanley Fisher 0%
Gary Forrester 100%
Eve Franklin 100%
Nancy Rice Fritz 100%
Daniel Clint Fuchs 0%
David Gallik 100%
Steven Gallus 100%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 100%
Kelly Gebhardt 0%
Carol Gibson 100%
Kim Gillan 100%
William Glaser 0%
George Golie 100%
Duane Grimes 0%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Richard Haines 0%
Kenneth Hansen 100%
Dan Harrington 100%
Christopher Kirk Harris 100%
Ray Hawk 0%
Donald Hedges 33%
Daniel Hurwitz 100%
Hal Jacobson 100%
Joey Jayne 100%
Royal Johnson 100%
Carol Juneau 100%
Dave Kasten 0%
Bob Keenan 0%
Sam Kitzenberg 0%
Richard Laible 0%
Carol Lambert 0%
Michael Lange 0%
Jesse Laslovich 66%
Jeff Laszloffy 0%
Bob Lawson 100%
Larry Lehman 0%
Ralph Lenhart 100%
Rick Maedje 0%
Dale Mahlum 0%
Bruce Malcolm 33%
Jeff Mangan 100%
Gary Matthews 100%
Bea McCarthy 100%
Daniel McGee 0%
Joe McKenney 0%
Walter McNutt 50%
Scott Mendenhall 0%
Doug Mood 0%
Penny Armstrong Morgan 0%
John Musgrove 100%
Linda Nelson 100%
Brad Newman 100%
Mark Noennig 66%
Bernie Olson 33%
John Parker 100%
Jeffrey Pattison 0%
Gerald Pease 100%
Gary Perry 0%
Holly Raser 100%
Diane Rice 0%
Donald Roberts 33%
N. Allen Rome 0%
John Ross 0%
Glenn Roush 100%
Brennan Ryan 100%
Don Ryan 100%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Clarice Schrumpf 0%
Debbie Bowman Shea 100%
Jim Shockley 33%
John Sinrud 0%
Veronica Small-Eastman 100%
Frank Smith 100%
Mike Sprague 50%
Corey Stapleton 0%
Ronald Stoker 0%
Emily Stonington 100%
Robert Story, Jr. 0%
Bill Tash 0%
Mike Taylor 0%
William Thomas 33%
Kenneth Toole, Jr. 100%
Joseph Tropila 0%
Pat Wagman 0%
Karl Waitschies 0%
Sandy Weiss 100%
Bill Wilson 100%
John Witt 0%
Cindy Younkin 33%
Tom Zook 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top