Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Peace Action

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 40%
Thomas William Osborne 0%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ed Pastor 80%
Ron Paul 40%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 0%
Tom Petri 40%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 0%
Todd Platts 0%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 60%
Jon Porter, Sr. 0%
Deborah Pryce 0%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 80%
James Ramstad 0%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Richard Renzi 0%
Silvestre Reyes 40%
Thomas Reynolds 0%
Jay Rockefeller IV 88%
Mike Rogers 0%
Mike Ross 40%
Steve Rothman 80%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 60%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 0%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 0%
Christopher Shays 40%
Donald Sherwood 0%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 20%
Ike Skelton 60%
Gordon Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 13%
Vic Snyder 80%
Hilda Solis 100%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 0%
John Spratt, Jr. 80%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Ted Stevens 0%
Ted Strickland 80%
Bart Stupak 80%
John Sullivan 0%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 0%
James Talent 0%
Tom Tancredo 0%
John Tanner 40%
Ellen Tauscher 60%
Charles Taylor 20%
Gene Taylor 60%
Lee Terry 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 80%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 60%
Mark Udall 80%
George Voinovich 0%
James Walsh 20%
Zach Wamp 0%
John Warner 0%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 80%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 0%
Robert Wexler 100%
Heather Wilson 0%
Frank Wolf 0%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 60%
Albert Wynn 80%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top