Rating Group: West Virginia AFL-CIO

2004 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
WV U.S. House-3 Evan Jenkins R 100%
WV State House-5 David Pethtel D 25%
WV State House-6 William Romine R 75%
WV State House-8 Bill Anderson, Jr. R 75%
WV State House-10 Frank Deem R 0%
WV State House-11 Bob Ashley R 67%
WV State House-16 Jim Morgan D 25%
WV State House-18 Kelli Sobonya R 50%
WV State House-19 Don Perdue D 100%
WV State House-21 Harry White D 25%
WV State House-32 David Perry D 25%
WV State House-34 Brent Boggs D 50%
WV State House-36 Larry Rowe D 100%
WV State House-39 Ronald Walters, Sr. R 100%
WV State House-40 Tim Armstead R 75%
WV State House-42 Ray Canterbury, Jr. R 75%
WV State House-43 William Hartman D 25%
WV State House-45 Bill Hamilton R 100%
WV State House-50 Mike Caputo D 100%
WV State House-50 Tim Manchin D 100%
WV State House-51 Barbara Fleischauer D 100%
WV State House-51 Cindy Frich R 50%
WV State House-54 Allen Evans R 50%
WV State House-61 Walter Duke R 50%
WV State House-62 John Overington R 25%
WV State Senate-1 H. Jack Yost, Jr. D 100%
WV State Senate-2 Jeffrey Kessler D 100%
WV State Senate-3 Donna Boley R 50%
WV State Senate-4 Mitchell Carmichael R 50%
WV State Senate-4 Mike Hall R 50%
WV State Senate-5 Robert Plymale D 100%
WV State Senate-13 Bob Beach D 25%
WV State Senate-13 Roman Prezioso, Jr. D 100%
WV State Senate-15 Craig Blair R 25%
WV State Senate-15 Charles Trump IV R 50%
WV State Senate-16 Herb Snyder D 50%
WV State Senate-16 John Unger II D 100%
WV State Senate-17 Corey Palumbo D 50%
WV Commissioner of Agriculture Walter Helmick D 50%
WV Mayor-At-Large Andy McKenzie 50%
WV Public Service Commissioner Brooks McCabe, Jr. 50%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Timothy Ennis D 25%
WV Commissioner-At-Large Dale Manuel 100%
Constantino Amores, Jr. 25%
Tom Azinger 25%
Billy Bailey, Jr. 100%
J.D. Beane 25%
Larry Border 50%
Edwin Bowman 100%
Bonnie Brown 75%
Dwight Richard Browning 50%
Greg Butcher 100%
Anita Skeens Caldwell 50%
Anna Laura Stewart Calvert 75%
Thomas Campbell 25%
Samuel Cann, Sr. 25%
Donald Caruth 25%
H. Truman Chafin 50%
Kevin Craig 25%
Gerald Crosier 25%
Joe DeLong 100%
Tracy Dempsey 100%
John Doyle 25%
Larry Edgell 100%
John Ellem 75%
Karen Facemyer 50%
Larry Faircloth 50%
John Fanning 0%
Joe Ferrell 100%
Daniel Foster 50%
Ronald Fragale 75%
Eustace Frederick 0%
Jesse Guills, Jr. 0%
Steve Harrison 0%
Barbara Hatfield 50%
Nancy Houston 25%
Greg Howard 100%
Lidella Hrutkay 100%
Jon Hunter 100%
Richard Iaquinta 75%
Robert Kiss 25%
Kerry Steven Kominar 25%
Earnest Kuhn 100%
Margarette Leach 25%
Otis Leggett 67%
Marshall Long 0%
William Louisos 75%
Shirley Love 50%
Virginia Mahan 25%
Dale Martin 100%
Jerry Mezzatesta 33%
Harold Michael 25%
Joseph Minard 50%
Sarah Minear 50%
Mike Oliverio II 100%
Brady Paxton 75%
John Pino 25%
Mary Poling 100%
Bill Proudfoot 25%
Donna Reid Renner 25%
Mike Ross 50%
Robert Schadler 75%
Patti Schoen 50%
William Sharpe, Jr. 50%
Stan Shaver 75%
John Shelton 25%
Jody Guthrie Smirl 50%
Lisa Smith 50%
Sharon Spencer 100%
Victor Sprouse 50%
Douglas Stalnaker 25%
W. Richard Staton 25%
William Stemple 25%
Linda Sumner 50%
Sally Matz Susman 67%
Randy Swartzmiller 25%
Robert Tabb 25%
Joe Talbott 50%
Rick Thompson 100%
Ron Thompson, Jr. 25%
Kenneth Tucker 100%
Scott Varner 25%
Christopher Wakim 25%
Barbara Warner 25%
Charles Russell Webb 100%
Carrie Webster 75%
Russell Weeks, Jr. 0%
Randy White 100%
L. Gil White 0%
Larry Williams 25%
Bill Wright 100%
Emily Yeager 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.