State Office Name Party Rating
WA U.S. House-5 Cathy McMorris Rodgers R 100%
WA State House-15 Position 1 Bruce Chandler R 100%
WA State House-20 Position 1 Richard DeBolt R 63%
WA State House-20 Position 2 Ed Orcutt R 83%
WA State House-22 Position 2 Sam Hunt D 38%
WA State House-29 Position 2 Steve Kirby D 25%
WA State House-31 Position 2 Christopher Hurst D 38%
WA State House-32 Position 2 Ruth Kagi D 25%
WA State House-34 Position 1 Eileen Cody D 38%
WA State House-35 Position 1 Kathy Haigh D 38%
WA State House-37 Position 1 Sharon Tomiko Santos D 38%
WA State House-40 Position 2 Jeff Morris D 38%
WA State House-43 Position 2 Frank Chopp D 28%
WA State House-44 Position 1 Hans Dunshee D 25%
WA State Senate-1 Rosemary McAuliffe D 13%
WA State Senate-9 Mark Schoesler R 88%
WA State Senate-12 Linda Parlette R 93%
WA State Senate-15 Jim Honeyford R 100%
WA State Senate-16 Mike Hewitt R 100%
WA State Senate-17 Donald Benton R 87%
WA State Senate-19 Brian Hatfield D 50%
WA State Senate-22 Karen Fraser D 7%
WA State Senate-24 Jim Hargrove D 50%
WA State Senate-25 Jim Kastama D 33%
WA State Senate-27 Jeannie Darneille D 38%
WA State Senate-29 Steve Conway D 38%
WA State Senate-30 Tracey Eide D 33%
WA State Senate-31 Pam Roach R 73%
WA State Senate-32 Maralyn Chase D 17%
WA State Senate-33 Karen Keiser D 13%
WA State Senate-35 Timothy Sheldon D 64%
WA State Senate-36 Jeanne Kohl-Welles D 13%
WA State Senate-37 Adam Kline D 13%
WA State Senate-39 Kirk Pearson R 75%
WA State Senate-42 Doug Ericksen R 71%
WA Mayor-At-Large Edward Murray D 38%
WA Council Member-8 Joe McDermott D 25%
WA Commissioner-1 Tom Mielke R 88%
WA Commissioner-2 Marc Boldt 88%
WA Commissioner-2 Sandra Singery Romero D 13%
WA Treasurer Jim McIntire D 13%
WA County Council-1 Dan Roach R 88%
WA County Council-2 Brian Sullivan D 17%
WA County Council-3 Roger Bush 88%
John Ahern 88%
Gary Alexander 63%
Glenn Anderson 75%
Mike Armstrong 83%
Clyde Ballard 88%
Ida Ballasiotes 75%
Kelly Barlean 75%
Brad Benson 75%
Jean Berkey 38%
Lisa Brown 14%
Jim Buck 75%
Jack Cairnes 50%
Tom Campbell 50%
Don Carlson 60%
Michael Carrell 88%
Sarah Casada 85%
Jim Clements 100%
Mike Cooper 38%
Jeralita Costa 13%
Don Cox 88%
Larry Crouse 100%
Alex Deccio 80%
Jerome Delvin 75%
Mary Lou Dickerson 13%
Mark Doumit 38%
James Dunn 88%
Jeanne Edwards 38%
William Eickmeyer 38%
Luke Esser 88%
Darlene Fairley 7%
Bill Finkbeiner 87%
Ruth Fisher 13%
Rosa Franklin 13%
Bill Fromhold 38%
Georgia Anne Gardner 14%
Jeffrey Gombosky 38%
Bill Grant 38%
Patricia Hale 79%
Shirley Hankins 75%
Mary Haugen 31%
Harold Hochstatter 100%
James Horn 79%
Brock Jackley 38%
Ken Jacobsen 13%
Fred Jarrett 63%
Stephen Johnson 80%
Phyllis Kenney 38%
Lynn Kessler 38%
Patricia Lantz 38%
Kelli Linville 38%
Barbara Lisk 100%
Jeanine Long 87%
John Lovick 38%
Dave Mastin 88%
Robert McCaslin 86%
Dan McDonald 86%
Mark Miloscia 25%
Maryann Mitchell 75%
Dave Morell 88%
Bob Morton 93%
Joyce Mulliken 100%
Toby Nixon 83%
Al O'Brien 38%
Valeria Ogden 38%
Robert Oke 80%
Cheryl Pflug 75%
Erik Poulsen 0%
Margarita Prentice 20%
Dave Quall 28%
Marilyn Rasmussen 47%
Aaron Reardon 38%
Debbie Regala 7%
Phil Rockefeller 38%
Dino Rossi 87%
Laura Ruderman 38%
Lynn Schindler 100%
Dave Schmidt 67%
Shay Schual-Berke 25%
Barry Sehlin 88%
Larry Sheahan 87%
Betti Sheldon 27%
Paull Shin 29%
Geoff Simpson 25%
Mary Skinner 86%
Sid Snyder 21%
Helen Sommers 28%
Harriet Spanel 13%
Val Stevens 100%
Bob Sump 88%
Dan Swecker 80%
Georganne Talcott 88%
Patricia Thibaudeau 13%
Kip Tokuda 38%
Steve Van Luven 75%
Velma Veloria 25%
James West 93%
Shirley Winsley 53%
Alex Wood 38%
Beverly Woods 86%
Joseph Zarelli 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.