Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana National Federation of Independent Business

2000-2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 100%
LA U.S. House 2 Cedric Richmond Democratic 50%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 80%
LA State Senate 1 A. Crowe, Jr. Republican 100%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 43%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 43%
LA State Senate 5 Karen Peterson Democratic 43%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 57%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 86%
LA State Senate 12 Ben Nevers, Sr. Democratic 57%
LA State Senate 13 Dale Erdey Republican 83%
LA State Senate 14 Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb Democratic 57%
LA State Senate 15 Sharon Broome Democratic 57%
LA State Senate 19 Gary Smith, Jr. Democratic 71%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 100%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 100%
LA State Senate 28 Eric LaFleur Democratic 71%
LA State Senate 29 Richard Gallot, Jr. Democratic 40%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 50%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 100%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 100%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 50%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 100%
LA Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry Michael Strain Republican 86%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 50%
Ernest Alexander 100%
Glenn Ansardi 75%
Diana Bajoie 40%
Robert Barham 60%
Clara Baudoin 67%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 50%
Ronald Bean 75%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 40%
Shirley Bowler 86%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 67%
Emile Bruneau 71%
James Cain 40%
Robert Carter 57%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 71%
Joel Chaisson II 40%
Carl Crane 100%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 25%
Israel Curtis 40%
N. J. Damico 100%
William Daniel IV 86%
Carla Dartez 100%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 60%
Emma Devillier 43%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 57%
John Diez 83%
Jean Doerge 43%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 86%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 75%
Sydnie Mae Durand 100%
Noble Ellington 60%
Rick Farrar 43%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 71%
Cleo Fields 25%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 86%
Heulette Fontenot 100%
Mickey Frith 100%
Gregory Lee Fruge 100%
Mike Futrell 100%
Butch Gautreaux 40%
Cedric Bradford Glover 50%
Kyle Mark Green 50%
Elcie Guillory 57%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 100%
Alexander Heaton 57%
Troy Hebert 86%
Francis Heitmeier 40%
Herman Ray Hill 43%
Donald Hines 40%
Melvin Lee Holden 60%
Ken Hollis 75%
Roy Hopkins 57%
Fred Hoyt 100%
Charles Irvin Hudson 60%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 43%
Nita Hutter 80%
Kay Iles 43%
Paulette Riley Irons 33%
Lydia Jackson 43%
Michael Jackson 43%
Jon Johnson 50%
Bill Jones 60%
Charles Jones 40%
Kay Katz 100%
Donald Kennard 86%
Lelon Kenney 83%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 50%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 100%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 71%
Arthur Lentini 80%
Leonard Lucas, Jr. 43%
Max Malone 80%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 25%
Charles McDonald 86%
Joe McPherson 25%
Thomas McVea 80%
Michael Michot 100%
Billy Montgomery 43%
Willie Mount 60%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 43%
Anthony Richard Perkins 83%
Wilfred Pierre 43%
Gillis Pinac 60%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 100%
Henry Powell 67%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 43%
Craig Romero 80%
Errol Romero 71%
Joe Salter 86%
Matthew Schneider III 100%
Melinda Schwegmann 67%
B.L. Shaw 86%
Jack Smith 86%
Jane Smith 71%
Kenneth Smith 60%
Jennifer Sneed 100%
Victor Stelly 100%
Patrick Swilling 25%
Gerald Theunissen 100%
Jerry Thomas 100%
Joseph Toomy 100%
Thomas Townsend 57%
Warren Triche, Jr. 100%
Jim Tucker 100%
J. Chris Ullo 100%
Wayne Waddell 71%
Diane Winston 83%
Ernest Wooton 71%
Thomas Wright 86%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top