Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund

2007-2008 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 93%
Brad Miller 88%
Harry Mitchell 94%
Alan Mollohan 81%
Dennis Moore 87%
Jim Moran, Jr. 100%
Patrick Murphy 75%
Jack Murtha 81%
Sue Myrick 13%
Ben Nelson 64%
Jim Oberstar 80%
Dave Obey 88%
John Olver 100%
Ed Pastor 88%
Donald Payne 100%
Tom Petri 50%
Todd Platts 69%
Earl Pomeroy 75%
Mark Pryor 64%
George Radanovich 6%
Nick Rahall II 94%
Denny Rehberg 13%
Silvestre Reyes 75%
Laura Richardson 71%
Jay Rockefeller IV 91%
Ciro Rodriguez 75%
Mike Rogers 13%
Mike Ross 50%
Steve Rothman 100%
John Salazar 63%
Ken Salazar 82%
William Sali 6%
Jean Schmidt 13%
Allyson Schwartz 100%
Joe Sestak, Jr. 100%
John Shadegg 6%
Carol Shea-Porter 94%
Heath Shuler 60%
Ike Skelton 73%
Olympia Snowe 64%
Vic Snyder 81%
Hilda Solis 93%
Mark Souder 19%
Zack Space 69%
Arlen Specter 40%
John Spratt, Jr. 81%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 6%
Ted Stevens 20%
Bart Stupak 73%
John Sullivan 13%
John Sununu 36%
Betty Sutton 88%
Tom Tancredo 7%
John Tanner 69%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Gene Taylor 73%
Lee Terry 25%
Todd Tiahrt 13%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 94%
Mark Udall 88%
George Voinovich 18%
Zach Wamp 19%
Diane Watson 94%
Mel Watt 93%
Henry Waxman 100%
Jim Webb, Jr. 73%
Anthony Weiner 100%
Robert Wexler 88%
Charlie Wilson, Jr. 81%
Frank Wolf 56%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Bill Young 44%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top