Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Wilderness Coalition

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 27%
Thomas William Osborne 0%
Major Owens 91%
Michael Oxley 9%
Ed Pastor 100%
Ron Paul 18%
Donald Payne 82%
John Peterson 0%
Tom Petri 55%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 0%
Todd Platts 9%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 73%
Jon Porter, Sr. 0%
Deborah Pryce 9%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 100%
James Ramstad 82%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Richard Renzi 0%
Silvestre Reyes 36%
Thomas Reynolds 0%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Mike Rogers 0%
Mike Ross 18%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 82%
José Serrano 100%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 0%
Christopher Shays 82%
Donald Sherwood 0%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 82%
Ike Skelton 36%
Gordon Smith 75%
Olympia Snowe 100%
Vic Snyder 100%
Hilda Solis 100%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 25%
John Spratt, Jr. 91%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Ted Stevens 0%
Ted Strickland 91%
Bart Stupak 64%
John Sullivan 0%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 27%
James Talent 0%
Tom Tancredo 0%
John Tanner 18%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 18%
Lee Terry 0%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 0%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 91%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
Mark Udall 100%
George Voinovich 0%
James Walsh 45%
Zach Wamp 0%
John Warner 0%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 100%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 9%
Gerald Weller 0%
Robert Wexler 100%
Heather Wilson 0%
Frank Wolf 0%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top