Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Research Institute for Economic Development

2009 Cumulative Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
OK U.S. House 5 Steve Russell Republican 68%
OK Lieutenant Governor Todd Lamb Republican 92%
OK State House 6 Chuck Hoskin Democratic 53%
OK State House 11 Earl Sears Republican 96%
OK State House 14 George Faught Republican 77%
OK State House 15 Ed Cannaday Democratic 38%
OK State House 17 Brian Renegar Democratic 31%
OK State House 24 Steve Kouplen Democratic 21%
OK State House 25 Todd Thomsen Republican 100%
OK State House 31 Jason Murphey Republican 46%
OK State House 34 Cory Williams Democratic 33%
OK State House 41 John Enns Republican 95%
OK State House 46 Scott Martin Republican 99%
OK State House 47 Leslie Osborn Republican 91%
OK State House 48 Pat Ownbey Republican 100%
OK State House 52 Charles Ortega Republican 91%
OK State House 57 Harold Wright Republican 96%
OK State House 59 Mike Sanders Republican 100%
OK State House 74 Dale Derby Republican 85%
OK State House 75 Dan Kirby Republican 100%
OK State House 77 Eric Proctor Democratic 59%
OK State House 79 Weldon Watson Republican 100%
OK State House 80 Mike Ritze Republican 50%
OK State House 83 Randy McDaniel Republican 95%
OK State House 94 Scott Inman Democratic 62%
OK State House 96 Lewis Moore Republican 98%
OK State Senate 10 Eddie Fields Republican 85%
OK State Senate 16 John Sparks Democratic 49%
OK State Senate 24 Anthony Sykes Republican 70%
OK State Senate 27 Bryce Marlatt Republican 90%
OK State Senate 32 Randy Bass Democratic 62%
OK State Senate 35 Gary Stanislawski Republican 93%
OK State Senate 36 Bill Brown Republican 82%
OK State Senate 37 Dan Newberry Republican 84%
OK State Senate 38 Mike Schulz Republican 82%
OK State Senate 48 Anastasia Pittman Democratic 56%
OK Secretary of State Chris Benge Republican 89%
OK Commissioner 2 Mike Thompson 94%
OK Commissioner 3 Ron Peters 93%
OK Treasurer Ken Miller Republican 93%
Tom Adelson 51%
Cliff Aldridge 82%
Patrick Anderson 81%
Don Armes 90%
John Auffet 57%
Dennis Bailey 27%
Roger Ballenger 40%
Gary Banz 89%
Don Barrington 90%
Lisa Billy 87%
Brian Bingman 98%
Gus Blackwell 85%
Cliff Branan 96%
Neil Brannon 52%
Randy Brogdon 65%
Mike Brown 45%
Samson Buck 14%
Sean Burrage 55%
John Wayne Carey 63%
Mike Christian 70%
Harry Coates, Jr. 84%
Glenn Coffee 93%
Wallace Collins 45%
Ann Coody 95%
Marian Cooksey 89%
Kenneth Corn 61%
Doug Cox 86%
Brian Crain 97%
Johnnie Crutchfield 67%
David Dank 95%
Lee Denney 96%
Dale DeWitt 89%
Joe Dorman 65%
Rex Duncan 69%
Mary Easley 56%
Judy Eason McIntyre 43%
Jerry Ellis 12%
John Ford 90%
Earl Garrison 58%
Larry Glenn 51%
Jay Paul Gumm 70%
Jim Halligan 90%
Rebecca Hamilton 26%
Terry Harrison, Jr. 48%
Jeff Hickman 90%
Wes Hilliard 56%
Corey Holland 87%
Tom Ivester 52%
Mike Jackson 95%
Shane Jett 88%
Constance Johnson 43%
Dennis Johnson 76%
Mike Johnson 92%
Clark Jolley 96%
Tad Jones 92%
Fred Jordan 88%
Charles Joyner 89%
Ron Justice 93%
Sally Kern 66%
Charles Key 63%
Ryan Dean Kiesel 52%
Lucky Lamons 82%
Charlie Laster 67%
Debbe Leftwich 60%
Richard Lerblance 55%
Guy Liebmann 95%
Ken Luttrell 41%
Steve Martin 93%
Mike Mazzei 89%
Al McAffrey 49%
Mark McCullough 97%
Jeannie McDaniel 60%
Skye McNiel 88%
Jerry McPeak 47%
Danny Morgan 66%
Richard Morrissette 29%
David Myers 88%
Bill Nations 58%
Jason Nelson 100%
Jonathan Nichols 87%
Susan Paddack 75%
Pam Peterson 85%
R. C. Pruett 70%
Jim Reynolds 84%
Mike Reynolds 46%
Andrew Rice 44%
Phil Richardson 98%
Paul Roan 59%
Wade Rousselot 57%
Colby Schwartz 95%
Seneca Scott 16%
TW Shannon 96%
Mike Shelton 25%
Ben Sherrer 57%
Jerry Shoemake 58%
Jabar Shumate 42%
Glen Bud Smithson 55%
Kris Steele 96%
Dan Sullivan 98%
Joe Loyd Sweeden 44%
Randy Terrill 81%
Sue Tibbs 91%
John Trebilcock 76%
Purcy Walker 68%
Paul Wesselhoft 58%
Jim Wilson 43%
John Wright 73%
Charles Wyrick 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top