or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maine National Federation of Independent Business

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
ME State House 26 Paul Davis, Sr. Republican 100%
ME State House 39 Brian Duprey Republican 100%
ME State House 74 Margaret Rotundo Democratic 50%
ME State House 78 Robert Nutting Republican 100%
ME State House 138 James Campbell, Sr. Unaffiliated 90%
ME State Senate 2 Ronald Collins Republican 100%
ME State Senate 10 Stanley Gerzofsky Democratic 30%
ME State Senate 11 Richard Woodbury Unenrolled 67%
ME State Senate 14 John Patrick Democratic 20%
ME State Senate 16 Margaret Craven Democratic 22%
ME State Senate 18 Thomas Saviello Republican 60%
ME State Senate 27 Douglas Thomas Republican 22%
ME State Senate 34 Roger Sherman Republican 100%
ME State Senate 35 Troy Jackson Democratic 10%
ME Attorney General Janet Mills Democratic 70%
ME Commissioner of Administrative and Financial Services Sawin Millett, Jr. No Party Affiliation 100%
ME Commissioner of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Chandler Woodcock 100%
ME Commissioner 2 James Annis Republican 100%
ME Commissioner 3 Elaine Makas Democratic 11%
ME Councilor At-Large Patricia Blanchette 30%
ME Councilor At-Large Michael Brennan Democratic 20%
Herbert Adams 20%
Walter Ash, Jr. 44%
Susan Austin 100%
Christopher Barstow 40%
Robert Berube 100%
L. Earl Bierman 100%
Larry Bliss 20%
Stephen Bowen 100%
David Bowles 100%
Joseph Brannigan 30%
Lynn Bromley 56%
Richard Brown 90%
William Browne 100%
Bruce Bryant 30%
Joan Bryant-Deschenes 100%
Marilyn Canavan 20%
Roderick Carr 100%
John Churchill 100%
Herbert Clark 10%
Harold Clough 100%
Philip Cressey 100%
Robert Crosthwaite 100%
Glenn Cummings 30%
Darlene Curley 100%
Robert A. Daigle 100%
Dennis Damon 44%
Gerald Davis 100%
Benjamin Dudley 20%
Edward Dugay 100%
Robert Duplessie 22%
John Eder 20%
Betheda Edmonds 30%
Sean Faircloth 30%
Edward Finch 50%
Jeremy Fischer 70%
Kenneth Fletcher 100%
Kenneth Gagnon 30%
Kevin Glynn 90%
Christian Greeley 100%
Carol Grose 11%
Randy Hotham 70%
Deborah Hutton 10%
Lawrence Jacobsen 100%
Rodney Jennings 22%
Arlan Jodrey 100%
Henry Joy 100%
Jeffrey Kaelin 100%
Theodore Koffman 20%
Arthur Lerman 30%
Sarah Lewin 100%
Jacqueline Lundeen 56%
Boyd Marley 22%
Lisa Marraché 50%
John Martin 50%
Arthur Mayo III 90%
Earle McCormick 90%
Terrence McKenney 100%
Elizabeth Mitchell 100%
Stanley Moody 100%
Frederick Moore III 100%
Roberta Muse 100%
Richard Nass 90%
Jacqueline Norton 20%
Lillian LaFontaine O'Brien 30%
Rosaire Paradis, Jr. 20%
Leila Percy 30%
Anne Perry 38%
Raymond Pineau 20%
Hannah Pingree 10%
John Piotti 38%
Christopher Rector 100%
Earl Richardson 100%
John Richardson 33%
Maitland Richardson 100%
Peter Rines 22%
Kimberley Rosen 100%
Sonya Sampson 33%
Christine Savage 100%
Thomas Shields 100%
Nancy Smith 22%
William Smith 30%
Ethan King Strimling 20%
Richard Sykes 100%
Joshua Tardy 100%
Judd Thompson 30%
A. David Trahan 100%
Karl Turner 90%
Joanne Twomey 20%
Michael Vaughan 100%
William Walcott 10%
Thomas Watson 22%
Carol Weston 90%
Walter Wheeler, Sr. 30%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top