Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants

2005-2006 Positions

Issues: Crime
State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 80%
Gary Ackerman 90%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 90%
Todd Akin 20%
Rodney Alexander 20%
Wayne Allard 10%
George Allen 20%
Thomas Allen 80%
Rob Andrews 70%
Joe Baca, Sr. 60%
Spencer Bachus 11%
Kay Bailey Hutchison 20%
Brian Baird 70%
Richard Hugh Baker 20%
J. Gresham Barrett 20%
John Barrow 40%
Roscoe Bartlett 50%
Charlie Bass 20%
Max Baucus 80%
Evan Bayh 70%
Melissa Bean 40%
Bob Beauprez 56%
Bob Bennett 20%
Shelley Berkley 70%
Howard Berman 90%
Marion Berry 60%
Judy Biggert 10%
Michael Bilirakis 20%
Jeff Bingaman 90%
Tim Bishop 70%
Sherwood Boehlert 20%
John Boehner 20%
Kit Bond 10%
Henry Bonilla 20%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 20%
Mary Bono Mack 11%
Dan Boren 40%
Leonard Boswell 44%
Rick Boucher 80%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 30%
Henry Brown, Jr. 22%
Ginny Brown-Waite 33%
Jim Bunning 20%
Conrad Burns 20%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 10%
Robert Byrd 90%
Dave Camp 20%
Chris Cannon 20%
Eric Cantor 22%
Dennis Cardoza 60%
Russ Carnahan 60%
Julia Carson 90%
Edward Case 56%
Mike Castle 20%
Lincoln Chafee 50%
Saxby Chambliss 10%
Ben Chandler III 30%
Chris Chocola 20%
Hillary Clinton 70%
Howard Coble 20%
Thomas Coburn 20%
Norm Coleman 30%
Kent Conrad 70%
Jerry Costello 50%
Larry Craig 30%
Robert Cramer 20%
Barbara Cubin 20%
Artur Davis 50%
Geoff Davis 10%
James Davis 57%
Jo Ann Davis 20%
Lincoln Davis 20%
Thomas Davis III 20%
Bill Delahunt 90%
James DeMint 9%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 20%
Norm Dicks 50%
John Dingell 80%
Chris Dodd 67%
Elizabeth Dole 20%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 9%
John Doolittle 20%
Byron Dorgan 80%
Thelma Drake 20%
David Dreier 20%
Chet Edwards 40%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 20%
Philip English 20%
John Ensign 30%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 88%
Terry Everett 20%
Chaka Fattah, Sr. 80%
Tom Feeney 25%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 30%
Bob Filner 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 56%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 20%
Barney Frank 90%
William Frist 20%
Elton Gallegly 20%
Jim Gerlach 20%
Jim Gibbons 20%
Wayne Gilchrest 37%
Paul Gillmor 20%
Phil Gingrey 11%
Charlie Gonzalez 67%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 20%
Bart Gordon 50%
Mark Green 30%
Judd Gregg 20%
Gilbert Gutknecht 30%
Charles Hagel 22%
Ralph Hall 20%
Tom Harkin 90%
Jane Harman 56%
Katherine Harris 20%
Melissa Hart 20%
Doc Hastings 20%
Robert Hayes 20%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 20%
Joel Hefley 20%
Wally Herger, Jr. 30%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 33%
Maurice Hinchey 90%
David Lee Hobson 20%
Pete Hoekstra 22%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 70%
John Nathan Hostettler 10%
Kenny Hulshof 20%
Duncan Hunter 20%
Henry Hyde 38%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 30%
Daniel Inouye 86%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 22%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 90%
William Jefferson 80%
James Merrill Jeffords 90%
William Lewis Jenkins 11%
Bobby Jindal 20%
Nancy Johnson 30%
Tim Johnson 40%
Timothy Johnson 70%
Paul Kanjorski 60%
Richard Keller 22%
Sue Kelly 20%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 78%
Mark Kennedy 20%
Patrick Kennedy 70%
Dale Kildee 90%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 90%
Jack Kingston 20%
Joseph Knollenberg 20%
Herb Kohl 80%
James Kolbe 20%
Dennis Kucinich 90%
John Kuhl, Jr. 20%
Jon Kyl 10%
Ray LaHood 33%
Mary Landrieu 70%
Tom Lantos 80%
Tom Latham 30%
Steve LaTourette 30%
Frank Lautenberg 80%
James Leach 30%
Carl Levin 90%
Jerry Lewis 10%
Ron Lewis 20%
Joe Lieberman 70%
Blanche Lincoln 80%
John Linder 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 22%
Dick Lugar 22%
Dan Lungren 40%
Connie Mack IV 30%
Don Manzullo 30%
Jim Marshall 30%
Melquiades Martinez 10%
Jim Matheson 30%
Carolyn McCarthy 60%
Thaddeus McCotter 20%
James McCrery III 20%
John McHugh 30%
Mike McIntyre 40%
Buck McKeon 20%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 80%
Martin Meehan 90%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 70%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 44%
Mike Michaud 80%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 90%
Gary Miller 20%
George Miller 90%
Brad Miller 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top