Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants

1995-1996 Positions

Issues: Crime
State Office District Name Party Rating
James Merrill Jeffords 60%
Nancy Johnson 13%
Timothy Johnson 25%
Harry Johnston 70%
J. Bennett Johnston 20%
Paul Kanjorski 38%
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 40%
Sue Kelly 0%
Dirk Kempthorne 10%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 90%
Joseph Kennedy II 87%
Patrick Kennedy 62%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 75%
Bob Kerrey 60%
John Kerry 80%
Dale Kildee 75%
Jay Kim 0%
Jack Kingston 0%
Gerald Kleczka 63%
Ronald Klink 38%
Scott Klug 13%
Joseph Knollenberg 13%
Herb Kohl 80%
James Kolbe 13%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 100%
Ray LaHood 13%
Tom Lantos 87%
Stephen Largent 13%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 25%
Greg Laughlin 33%
Frank Lautenberg 90%
Rick Lazio 25%
James Leach 13%
Carl Levin 80%
Jerry Lewis 14%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 33%
Jim Lightfoot 10%
Blanche Lincoln 40%
John Linder 0%
William Lipinski 38%
Robert Livingston 13%
Trent Lott, Sr. 10%
Dick Lugar 10%
William Luther 63%
Connie Mack 11%
Thomas Manton 50%
Don Manzullo 13%
Matthew Martinez 87%
Frank Mascara 38%
Robert Matsui 100%
Karen McCarthy 62%
Bill McCollum 13%
James McCrery III 0%
Joseph McDade 17%
Jim McDermott 100%
Paul McHale 38%
John McHugh 0%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 0%
David McIntosh 0%
Buck McKeon 13%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 75%
Martin Meehan 75%
Carrie Meek 100%
Jack Metcalf 0%
Jan Meyers 20%
John Mica 0%
Barbara Mikulski 90%
Dan Miller 13%
George Miller 87%
David Minge 38%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 100%
John Moakley 87%
Susan Molinari 0%
Alan Mollohan 75%
G.V. Montgomery 30%
Carlos Moorhead 20%
Jim Moran, Jr. 63%
Constance Morella 50%
Carol Moseley Braun 90%
Patrick Moynihan 90%
Frank Murkowski 10%
Jack Murtha 50%
Sue Myrick 0%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 0%
Mark Neumann 0%
Robert William Ney 0%
Don Nickles 0%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 0%
Sam Nunn 40%
James Nussle 13%
Jim Oberstar 75%
Dave Obey 75%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 38%
Bill Orton 20%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ronald Packard 13%
Mike Parker 25%
Ed Pastor 100%
William Paxon 13%
Donald Payne 100%
Lewis Payne, Jr. 30%
Clay Pell, Jr. 80%
Pete Peterson 25%
Tom Petri 0%
Owen Pickett 25%
Richard Pombo 13%
Earl Pomeroy 62%
John Edward Porter 13%
Glenn Poshard 25%
Larry Pressler 0%
Deborah Pryce 13%
David Pryor 44%
Jack Quinn 38%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 50%
James Ramstad 13%
Charlie Rangel 100%
Ralph Regula 13%
Harry Reid 50%
Bill Richardson 38%
Frank Riggs 13%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 63%
Charles Robb 50%
Jay Rockefeller IV 50%
Timothy Roemer 50%
Charles Rose III 44%
Toby Roth 20%
William Roth, Jr. 10%
Marge Roukema 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Matt Salmon 0%
Rick Santorum 11%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Thomas Sawyer 87%
Jim Saxton 0%
Joe Scarborough 0%
Daniel Schaefer 0%
Steven Schiff 0%
Pat Schroeder 60%
John Shadegg 13%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 13%
Christopher Shays 50%
E.G. Shuster 0%
Paul Simon 90%
Alan Simpson 0%
Norman Sisisky 50%
David Skaggs 87%
Joseph Skeen 13%
Ike Skelton 38%
Linda Smith 13%
Nick Smith 38%
Bob Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 30%
Gerald B.H. Solomon 0%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 44%
Floyd Spence, Sr. 0%
John Spratt, Jr. 62%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Charles Stenholm 0%
Ted Stevens 10%
Louis Stokes 100%
Gerry Studds 80%
Bob Stump 0%
Bart Stupak 50%
James Talent 13%
John Tanner 13%
William Tauzin II 0%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 13%
Frank Tejeda 43%
Craig Thomas 10%
William Thomas 0%
Fred Thompson 10%
Ray Thornton 30%
Karen Thurman 63%
Strom Thurmond 10%
Todd Tiahrt 13%
Peter Torkildsen 20%
Esteban Edward Torres 100%
Ed Towns 100%
James Traficant, Jr. 25%
Bruce Vento 100%
Harold Volkmer 30%
Barbara Vucanovich 30%
James Walsh 13%
Zach Wamp 0%
John Warner 10%
Mel Watt 87%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 25%
Henry Waxman 87%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top