Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Citizens United for Rehabilitation of Errants

1995-1996 Positions

Issues: Crime
State Office District Name Party Rating
Edmond Spencer Abraham 20%
Gary Ackerman 75%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Wayne Allard 0%
Rob Andrews 38%
Bill Archer 13%
Richard Armey 0%
John Ashcroft 10%
Henry Scott Baesler 0%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
William Baker 20%
Cass Ballenger 0%
James Barcia 50%
Bob Barr, Jr. 0%
Bill Barrett 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 13%
Herbert Bateman 0%
Max Baucus 33%
Anthony Beilenson 63%
Bob Bennett 33%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 50%
Douglas Bereuter 0%
Howard Berman 87%
Tom Bevill 20%
Brian Bilbray 0%
Michael Bilirakis 13%
Jeff Bingaman 80%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 13%
Peter Blute 30%
Sherwood Boehlert 25%
Kit Bond 20%
Henry Bonilla 13%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Sonny Bono 13%
Robert Borski, Jr. 50%
Rick Boucher 57%
Bill Bradley 70%
John Breaux 60%
George Brown, Jr. 100%
Hank Brown 10%
Richard Bryan 60%
Ed Bryant 0%
John Bryant 50%
Dale Bumpers 80%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 10%
Dan Burton 13%
Steve Buyer 13%
Robert Byrd 30%
Herbert Callahan 0%
Ben Campbell 10%
Thomas Campbell 50%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 13%
Mike Castle 13%
John Chafee 50%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 0%
Jon Lynn Christensen 0%
William Clay, Sr. 100%
Eva Clayton 87%
Robert Clement 25%
William Cohen 30%
Ronald Coleman 50%
Barbara-Rose Collins 90%
Cardiss Collins 88%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 0%
Gary Condit 13%
Kent Conrad 75%
Jerry Costello 38%
Paul Coverdell 0%
Christopher Cox 13%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 10%
Robert Cramer 0%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Alfonse D'Amato 10%
Patsy Ann Danner 25%
Thomas Daschle 80%
Thomas Davis III 13%
E. Kika de la Garza 40%
Thomas DeLay 13%
Ronald Dellums 100%
Peter Deutsch 38%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Jay Dickey 0%
Norm Dicks 50%
Julian Dixon 100%
Chris Dodd 80%
Robert Dole 11%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 14%
Byron Dorgan 89%
Robert Dornan 10%
David Dreier 13%
Jennifer Dunn 0%
Chet Edwards 38%
Vern Ehlers 25%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 0%
Bill Emerson 20%
Philip English 0%
John Ensign 38%
Lane Evans 87%
Terry Everett 0%
Thomas Ewing 13%
Jim Exon 50%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 10%
Harris Fawell 13%
Victor Fazio 87%
Russ Feingold 80%
Cleo Fields 90%
Jack Fields, Jr. 0%
Bob Filner 100%
Floyd Flake 100%
Thomas Foglietta 100%
Michael Patrick Forbes 0%
Wendell Ford 40%
Tillie Fowler 13%
Jon David Fox 0%
Barney Frank 100%
Gary Franks 20%
Robert Franks 0%
William Frist 20%
Jonas Frost III 43%
Elizabeth Furse 71%
Elton Gallegly 13%
John Ganske 13%
Sam Gejdenson 87%
George Gekas 13%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 62%
Pete Geren 20%
Sam Gibbons 40%
Wayne Gilchrest 13%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Benjamin Gilman 14%
John Glenn 89%
Henry Gonzalez 87%
William Goodling 0%
Bart Gordon 25%
Slade Gorton 10%
Porter Goss 0%
Daniel Graham 60%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Rodney Grams 11%
James Greenwood 25%
Judd Gregg 11%
Steven Gunderson 20%
Gilbert Gutknecht 25%
Tony Hall 50%
Lee Hamilton 50%
Melton Hancock 0%
James Hansen 13%
Jane Harman 86%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Mark Hatfield 80%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
W.G. Hefner 50%
Jesse Helms 10%
Wally Herger, Jr. 13%
Van Hilleary 0%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 87%
David Lee Hobson 13%
Pete Hoekstra 13%
Thomas Holden 0%
Ernest Hollings 70%
Stephen Horn 25%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 25%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 25%
Kay Hutchison 10%
Henry Hyde 13%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 25%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 80%
William Jefferson 86%
James Merrill Jeffords 60%
Nancy Johnson 13%
Harry Johnston 70%
J. Bennett Johnston 20%
Paul Kanjorski 38%
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 40%
Sue Kelly 0%
Dirk Kempthorne 10%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 90%
Joseph Kennedy II 87%
Patrick Kennedy 62%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 75%
Bob Kerrey 60%
Dale Kildee 75%
Jay Kim 0%
Gerald Kleczka 63%
Ronald Klink 38%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top