| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | U.S. Senate | Jr | James Risch | Republican | 67% |
| ID | U.S. House | 2 | Mike Simpson | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State House | 8B | Lenore Barrett | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State House | 9A | Lawerence Denney | Republican | 100% |
| ID | State House | 25A | Maxine Bell | Republican | 67% |
| ID | State House | 32B | Thomas Loertscher | Republican | 67% |
| ID | State House | 35A | JoAn Wood | Republican | 67% |
| ID | State Senate | 1 | Shawn Keough | Republican | 67% |
| ID | State Senate | 27 | Dean Cameron | No Party Affiliation | 67% |
| ID | State Senate | 32 | John Tippets | Republican | 100% |
| ID | Chairman of the Tax Commission | Robert Geddes | Republican | 100% | |
| ID | Director of the Department of Agriculture | Celia Gould | Republican | 67% | |
| ID | Director of the Department of Insurance | William Deal | Republican | 100% | |
| ID | Public Utilities Commissioner | Paul Kjellander | Republican | 100% | |
| John Alexander | 100% | ||||
| Jeffrey Alltus | 67% | ||||
| John Andreason | 67% | ||||
| Jack Barraclough | 100% | ||||
| John Patrick Bieter | 100% | ||||
| Dave Bivens | 100% | ||||
| Max Black | 100% | ||||
| Ron Black | 100% | ||||
| Clyde Boatright | 67% | ||||
| Donna Boe | 100% | ||||
| W. Ric Branch | 100% | ||||
| Frank Bruneel | 67% | ||||
| Harold Bunderson | 67% | ||||
| Don Burtenshaw | 100% | ||||
| David Callister | 100% | ||||
| John Campbell | 100% | ||||
| Roger Chase | 100% | ||||
| James Clark | 67% | ||||
| Dolores Crow | 100% | ||||
| Gordon Crow | 67% | ||||
| Charles Cuddy | 100% | ||||
| Judith Danielson | 100% | ||||
| Denton Darrington | 100% | ||||
| Darrel Deide | 100% | ||||
| Betsy Dunklin | 67% | ||||
| Julie Ellsworth | 100% | ||||
| Debbie Field | 100% | ||||
| Frances Field | 100% | ||||
| Evan Frasure | 67% | ||||
| Lee Gagner | 67% | ||||
| Robert Geddes, Sr. | 67% | ||||
| J. Steven Hadley | 67% | ||||
| John Hansen | 100% | ||||
| M. Reed Hansen | 67% | ||||
| Stan Hawkins | 67% | ||||
| Margaret Henbest | 100% | ||||
| Twila Hornbeck | 100% | ||||
| Cecil Ingram | 67% | ||||
| Grant Ipsen | 67% | ||||
| Wendy Jaquet | 100% | ||||
| Donna Jones | 100% | ||||
| Douglas Jones | 67% | ||||
| Jim Jones | 100% | ||||
| June Judd | 100% | ||||
| Hilde Kellogg | 100% | ||||
| Jim Kempton | 67% | ||||
| Wayne Kendell | 100% | ||||
| Robbi King-Barrutia | 100% | ||||
| Kent Kunz | 67% | ||||
| Dennis Lake | 67% | ||||
| Robert Lee | 100% | ||||
| Golden Linford | 67% | ||||
| Dan Mader | 67% | ||||
| Shirley McKague | 100% | ||||
| Marguerite Pearl McLaughlin | 67% | ||||
| Wayne Meyer | 67% | ||||
| Maynard Miller | 100% | ||||
| Max Mortensen | 67% | ||||
| Bruce Newcomb | 67% | ||||
| Laird Noh | 100% | ||||
| Atwell Parry | 100% | ||||
| Don Pischner | 67% | ||||
| Horace Pomeroy | 100% | ||||
| Dorothy Reynolds | 100% | ||||
| Melvin Richardson | 67% | ||||
| Diana Siddoway Richman | 67% | ||||
| Tim Ridinger | 100% | ||||
| Jack Riggs | 67% | ||||
| Kenneth Robison | 67% | ||||
| William Sali | 100% | ||||
| John Sandy | 100% | ||||
| Robert Schaefer, Sr. | 100% | ||||
| Gary Schroeder | 67% | ||||
| Sheila Sorensen | 67% | ||||
| W. Stennett | 67% | ||||
| John Stevenson | 67% | ||||
| James Stoicheff | 100% | ||||
| Ruby Stone | 100% | ||||
| Mark Darwin Stubbs | 67% | ||||
| Bruce Sweeney | 50% | ||||
| W.O. Taylor | 67% | ||||
| Jerrold Thorne | 100% | ||||
| Fred Tilman | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Trail | 100% | ||||
| Jerry Twiggs | 100% | ||||
| Larry Watson | 50% | ||||
| Cameron Wheeler | 67% | ||||
| Ralph Wheeler | 100% | ||||
| A. Lin Whitworth | 33% | ||||
| Christian Zimmermann | 100% |
Special Interest Groups
Rating Group: Idaho National Federation of Independent Business
1998 Positions
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
