Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Freedom Democrats

2005-2006 Positions on Economic Issues

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 13%
Gary Ackerman 10%
Todd Akin 68%
Rodney Alexander 15%
Thomas Allen 13%
Rob Andrews 30%
Joe Baca, Sr. 13%
Spencer Bachus 18%
Brian Baird 10%
Richard Hugh Baker 25%
J. Gresham Barrett 85%
John Barrow 10%
Roscoe Bartlett 60%
Charlie Bass 80%
Melissa Bean 80%
Bob Beauprez 70%
Shelley Berkley 18%
Howard Berman 15%
Marion Berry 15%
Judy Biggert 33%
Michael Bilirakis 45%
Tim Bishop 13%
Sherwood Boehlert 20%
Henry Bonilla 15%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 20%
Mary Bono Mack 18%
Dan Boren 15%
Leonard Boswell 8%
Rick Boucher 8%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 13%
Henry Brown, Jr. 23%
Ginny Brown-Waite 38%
Dan Burton 48%
Steve Buyer 38%
Dave Camp 13%
Chris Cannon 40%
Eric Cantor 25%
Dennis Cardoza 15%
Russ Carnahan 13%
Julia Carson 20%
Edward Case 8%
Mike Castle 33%
Ben Chandler III 15%
Chris Chocola 85%
Howard Coble 55%
Jerry Costello 20%
Robert Cramer 8%
Barbara Cubin 45%
Artur Davis 10%
Geoff Davis 25%
James Davis 8%
Jo Ann Davis 40%
Lincoln Davis 20%
Thomas Davis III 18%
Bill Delahunt 13%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 18%
Norm Dicks 8%
John Dingell 10%
John Doolittle 15%
Thelma Drake 20%
David Dreier 18%
Chet Edwards 10%
Vern Ehlers 35%
Jo Ann Emerson 18%
Philip English 18%
Bob Etheridge 8%
Lane Evans 10%
Terry Everett 45%
Tom Feeney 85%
Michael Ferguson 33%
Bob Filner 13%
Mark Foley 20%
Harold Ford, Jr. 43%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 68%
Barney Frank 30%
Elton Gallegly 15%
Jim Gerlach 15%
Jim Gibbons 78%
Wayne Gilchrest 13%
Paul Gillmor 25%
Phil Gingrey 40%
Charlie Gonzalez 13%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 23%
Bart Gordon 15%
Mark Green 75%
Gilbert Gutknecht 75%
Ralph Hall 18%
Jane Harman 13%
Katherine Harris 75%
Melissa Hart 25%
Doc Hastings 15%
Robert Hayes 15%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 85%
Joel Hefley 88%
Wally Herger, Jr. 45%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 13%
Maurice Hinchey 8%
David Lee Hobson 13%
Pete Hoekstra 23%
Thomas Holden 10%
Rush Holt, Jr. 15%
Darlene Hooley 13%
John Nathan Hostettler 40%
Kenny Hulshof 18%
Duncan Hunter 18%
Henry Hyde 20%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 88%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 40%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 18%
William Jefferson 5%
William Lewis Jenkins 40%
Nancy Johnson 10%
Tim Johnson 40%
Paul Kanjorski 13%
Ric Keller 58%
Sue Kelly 23%
Mark Kennedy 65%
Patrick Kennedy 15%
Dale Kildee 15%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 15%
Jack Kingston 23%
Joseph Knollenberg 15%
James Kolbe 23%
Dennis Kucinich 15%
John Kuhl, Jr. 13%
Ray LaHood 13%
Tom Lantos 10%
Tom Latham 10%
Steve LaTourette 13%
James Leach 30%
Jerry Lewis 13%
Ron Lewis 38%
John Linder 75%
Dan Lungren 55%
Connie Mack IV 53%
Don Manzullo 35%
Jim Marshall 18%
Jim Matheson 60%
Carolyn McCarthy 10%
Thaddeus McCotter 25%
James McCrery III 15%
John McHugh 20%
Mike McIntyre 13%
Buck McKeon 18%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 18%
Michael McNulty 15%
Martin Meehan 18%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 10%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 10%
Mike Michaud 15%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 10%
Gary Miller 40%
George Miller 15%
Brad Miller 5%
Alan Mollohan 15%
Dennis Moore 25%
Jim Moran, Jr. 13%
Jack Murtha 3%
Marilyn Musgrave 70%
Sue Myrick 78%
Robert William Ney 20%
Anne Northup 20%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 75%
James Nussle 18%
Jim Oberstar 5%
Dave Obey 15%
John Olver 13%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 3%
Thomas William Osborne 13%
Major Owens 15%
Michael Oxley 13%
Ed Pastor 15%
Ron Paul 98%
Donald Payne 10%
John Peterson 13%
Tom Petri 85%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 13%
Todd Platts 35%
Richard Pombo 20%
Earl Pomeroy 10%
Jon Porter, Sr. 30%
Deborah Pryce 20%
George Radanovich 30%
Nick Rahall II 15%
James Ramstad 75%
Ralph Regula 10%
Denny Rehberg 13%
Richard Renzi 18%
Silvestre Reyes 15%
Thomas Reynolds 15%
Mike Rogers 25%
Mike Ross 5%
Steve Rothman 10%
Jim Ryun 38%
Martin Olav Sabo 10%
John Salazar 15%
Jim Saxton 20%
Allyson Schwartz 8%
John Schwarz 5%
John Shadegg 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top