Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: NARAL Pro-Choice America

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Thomas Reynolds 0%
Bob Riley 0%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 100%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Ciro Rodriguez 100%
Timothy Roemer 0%
Steve Rothman 100%
Marge Roukema 66%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Max Sandlin, Jr. 60%
Rick Santorum 20%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 0%
Joe Scarborough 0%
Robert Schaffer 0%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 22%
Christopher Shays 73%
Donald Sherwood 0%
Ronnie Shows 0%
Norman Sisisky 58%
Joseph Skeen 0%
Ike Skelton 0%
Gordon Smith 20%
Nick Smith 7%
Bob Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 90%
Vic Snyder 93%
Mark Souder 0%
Arlen Specter 90%
Floyd Spence 0%
John Spratt, Jr. 60%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 0%
Charles Stenholm 0%
Ted Stevens 20%
Ted Strickland 60%
Bob Stump 0%
Bart Stupak 0%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 44%
Tom Tancredo 0%
John Tanner 60%
Ellen Tauscher 100%
William Tauzin 0%
Charles Taylor 0%
Gene Taylor 0%
Lee Terry 0%
Craig Thomas 20%
William Thomas 36%
Fred Thompson 0%
Karen Thurman 93%
Strom Thurmond 20%
Todd Tiahrt 0%
John Tierney 100%
Robert Torricelli 90%
Ed Towns 100%
James Traficant, Jr. 0%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
James Turner 53%
Mark Udall 100%
George Voinovich 0%
James Walsh 0%
Zach Wamp 0%
John Warner 20%
Wesley Watkins 0%
Mel Watt 100%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 0%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 0%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 0%
Paul Wellstone 100%
Robert Wexler 100%
Heather Wilson 7%
Frank Wolf 0%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 100%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top