Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Council for a Livable World

2009-2010 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 50%
Gary Ackerman 33%
John Adler 16%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 0%
Jason Altmire 50%
Rob Andrews 33%
Michael Arcuri 50%
Steve Austria 0%
Joe Baca, Sr. 66%
Michele Bachmann 0%
Spencer Bachus 0%
Brian Baird 50%
J. Gresham Barrett 16%
John Barrow 50%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 44%
Melissa Bean 33%
Mark Begich 100%
Bob Bennett 55%
Shelley Berkley 83%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 66%
Judy Biggert 33%
Brian Bilbray 0%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Tim Bishop 100%
John Boccieri 33%
Kit Bond 0%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
Sonny Bono 0%
Dan Boren 33%
Leonard Boswell 83%
Rick Boucher 33%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
Bruce Braley 100%
Bobby Bright 16%
Paul Broun 16%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Scott Brown 33%
Ginny Brown-Waite 33%
Jim Bunning 0%
Roland Burris 44%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Robert Byrd 22%
Dave Camp 33%
Thomas Campbell 33%
Eric Cantor 0%
Joseph Cao 0%
Walter Holden Capps 100%
Dennis Cardoza 66%
Russ Carnahan 83%
Christopher Carney 50%
Julia Carson 50%
Mike Castle 50%
Saxby Chambliss 0%
Ben Chandler III 33%
Travis Childers 33%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Howard Coble 50%
Thomas Coburn 0%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jerry Costello 66%
Mark Critz 0%
Kathy Dahlkemper 66%
Artur Davis 16%
Geoff Davis 0%
Lincoln Davis 33%
Bill Delahunt 83%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Norm Dicks 50%
John Dingell 33%
Charles Djou 0%
Chris Dodd 88%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 0%
Steve Driehaus 50%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 66%
Brad Ellsworth 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 16%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 33%
Russ Feingold 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Barney Frank 83%
Elton Gallegly 0%
Jim Gerlach 16%
Gabrielle Giffords 50%
Phil Gingrey 16%
Henry Gonzalez 83%
Carte Goodwin 0%
Bart Gordon 83%
Judd Gregg 33%
Parker Griffith, Jr. 33%
Kay Hagan 100%
John Hall 66%
Ralph Hall 0%
Debbie Halvorson 33%
Phil Hare 100%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 83%
Doc Hastings 16%
Wally Herger, Jr. 16%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 33%
Baron Hill 50%
Maurice Hinchey 83%
Paul Hodes 100%
Pete Hoekstra 33%
Thomas Holden 50%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 0%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 83%
Mike Johanns 11%
Tim Johnson 83%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Steve Kagen 100%
Paul Kanjorski 66%
Ted Kaufman 44%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Patrick Kennedy 33%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 66%
Mary Jo Kilroy 83%
Jack Kingston 0%
Paul Kirk, Jr. 22%
Larry Kissell 33%
Ron Klein 50%
Herb Kohl 100%
Suzanne Kosmas 33%
Frank Kratovil, Jr. 50%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
Jon Kyl 0%
Mary Landrieu 100%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 0%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Chris Lee 16%
George LeMieux 0%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 77%
Blanche Lincoln 88%
John Linder 16%
Dick Lugar 77%
Dan Lungren 0%
Connie Mack IV 16%
Dan Maffei 83%
Don Manzullo 0%
Betsy Markey 50%
Jim Marshall 0%
Melquiades Martinez 0%
Eric Massa 50%
Jim Matheson 50%
Carolyn McCarthy 16%
Thaddeus McCotter 16%
John McHugh 16%
Mike McIntyre 33%
Buck McKeon 0%
Michael McMahon 16%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 50%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 33%
Mike Michaud 100%
Gary Miller 0%
George Miller 100%
Brad Miller 66%
Walt Minnick 33%
Harry Mitchell 66%
Alan Mollohan 50%
Dennis Moore 33%
Jim Moran, Jr. 83%
Patrick Murphy 66%
Scott Murphy 50%
Jack Murtha 50%
Sue Myrick 0%
Ben Nelson 88%
Glenn Nye III 33%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 50%
Bill Owens 16%
Ed Pastor 83%
Ron Paul 100%
Donald Payne 83%
Tom Perriello 83%
Tom Petri 50%
Todd Platts 0%
Earl Pomeroy 50%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 50%
Denny Rehberg 16%
Silvestre Reyes 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top