Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Humane Society Legislative Fund

1995-1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 50%
Sue Kelly 50%
Dirk Kempthorne 0%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Joseph Kennedy II 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 50%
Bob Kerrey 100%
Dale Kildee 75%
Jay Kim 0%
Jack Kingston 0%
Gerald Kleczka 50%
Ronald Klink 75%
Scott Klug 25%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 75%
James Kolbe 0%
Jon Kyl 50%
John LaFalce 75%
Ray LaHood 0%
Tom Lantos 100%
Stephen Largent 25%
Tom Latham 0%
Steve LaTourette 25%
Greg Laughlin 0%
Frank Lautenberg 100%
Rick Lazio 25%
James Leach 50%
Carl Levin 100%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 0%
Joe Lieberman 75%
Jim Lightfoot 0%
Blanche Lincoln 35%
John Linder 25%
William Lipinski 100%
Robert Livingston 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 25%
Dick Lugar 50%
William Luther 50%
Connie Mack 50%
Thomas Manton 25%
Don Manzullo 50%
Matthew Martinez 0%
Frank Mascara 25%
Robert Matsui 50%
Karen McCarthy 75%
Bill McCollum 25%
James McCrery III 0%
Joseph McDade 50%
Paul McHale 75%
John McHugh 0%
CO Commissioner 2 Scott McInnis 25%
David McIntosh 0%
Buck McKeon 0%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 50%
Jack Metcalf 0%
Jan Meyers 45%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Dan Miller 50%
George Miller 100%
David Minge 25%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 75%
John Moakley 100%
Susan Molinari 25%
Alan Mollohan 0%
G.V. Montgomery 35%
Carlos Moorhead 15%
Jim Moran, Jr. 75%
Constance Morella 75%
Carol Moseley Braun 75%
Patrick Moynihan 75%
Frank Murkowski 33%
Jack Murtha 50%
Sue Myrick 25%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 0%
Mark Neumann 75%
Robert William Ney 25%
Don Nickles 75%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 25%
Sam Nunn 70%
James Nussle 0%
Jim Oberstar 25%
Dave Obey 50%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 0%
Bill Orton 30%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ronald Packard 0%
Mike Parker 0%
Ed Pastor 25%
William Paxon 0%
Donald Payne 100%
Lewis Payne, Jr. 25%
Clay Pell 90%
Pete Peterson 45%
Tom Petri 25%
Owen Pickett 0%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 0%
John Edward Porter 50%
Glenn Poshard 50%
Larry Pressler 0%
Deborah Pryce 33%
David Pryor 60%
Jack Quinn 0%
George Radanovich 0%
Nick Rahall II 25%
James Ramstad 50%
Ralph Regula 25%
Bill Richardson 75%
Frank Riggs 25%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 100%
Charles Robb 75%
Jay Rockefeller IV 75%
Timothy Roemer 50%
Charles Rose III 70%
Toby Roth 0%
William Roth, Jr. 100%
Marge Roukema 50%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Rick Santorum 66%
Paul Sarbanes 75%
Jim Saxton 0%
Joe Scarborough 50%
Daniel Schaefer 0%
Steven Schiff 33%
Pat Schroeder 90%
John Shadegg 0%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 25%
Christopher Shays 75%
E.G. Shuster 25%
Paul Simon 90%
Alan Simpson 10%
Norman Sisisky 0%
David Skaggs 50%
Joseph Skeen 0%
Ike Skelton 0%
Linda Smith 25%
Nick Smith 0%
Bob Smith 75%
Olympia Snowe 75%
Gerald B.H. Solomon 25%
Mark Souder 25%
Arlen Specter 75%
Floyd Spence 25%
John Spratt, Jr. 50%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 80%
Charles Stenholm 0%
Ted Stevens 50%
Louis Stokes 66%
Gerry Studds 85%
Bob Stump 0%
Bart Stupak 33%
James Talent 0%
John Tanner 0%
William Tauzin 0%
Charles Taylor 25%
Gene Taylor 75%
Frank Tejeda 35%
Craig Thomas 50%
William Thomas 0%
Fred Thompson 100%
Ray Thornton 25%
Karen Thurman 25%
Strom Thurmond 50%
Todd Tiahrt 25%
Peter Torkildsen 40%
Esteban Edward Torres 75%
Robert Torricelli 66%
Ed Towns 100%
James Traficant, Jr. 25%
Bruce Vento 100%
Harold Volkmer 35%
Barbara Vucanovich 10%
James Walsh 0%
Zach Wamp 50%
John Warner 50%
Mel Watt 50%
Julius Caesar Watts, Jr. 0%
Henry Waxman 100%
David Weldon 25%
W. Curtis Weldon 0%
Gerald Weller 25%
Paul Wellstone 100%
Rick White 25%
Pat Williams 35%
Charles Wilson 35%
Bob Wise, Jr. 0%
Frank Wolf 25%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
Albert Wynn 75%
Sidney Yates 75%
Bill Young 0%
Bill Zeliff 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top