or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Measure Details

Temporary Taxes to Fund Education. Guaranteed Local Public Safety Funding. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.

California Ballot Measure - Proposition 30

Yes
7,014,114
(55.37%)

Argument For

No
5,653,636
(44.63%)

Argument Against

Summary

- Increases personal income tax on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years.

- Increases sales and use tax by ¼ cent for four years.

- Allocates temporary tax revenues 89 percent to K-12 schools and 11 percent to community colleges.

- Bars use of funds for administrative costs, but provides local school governing boards discretion to decide, in open meetings and subject to annual audit, how funds are to be spent.

- Guarantees funding for public safety services realigned from state to local governments.

Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government:

- Additional state tax revenues of about $6 billion annually from 2012–13 through 2016–17. Smaller amounts of additional revenue would be available in 2011–12, 2017–18, and 2018–19.

- These additional revenues would be available to fund programs in the state budget. Spending reductions of about $6 billion in 2012–13, mainly to education programs, would not take effect.

Measure Text

Increases taxes on earnings over $250,000 for seven years and sales taxes by 1/4 cent for four years, to fund schools. Guarantees public safety realignment funding. Fiscal Impact: Increased state tax revenues through 2018–19, averaging about $6 billion annually over the next few years. Revenues available for funding state budget. In 2012–13, planned spending reductions, primarily to education programs, would not occur.

Back to top