Senator Al Franken's Political Positions

Office: U.S. Senate (MN) - Jr, Democratic/Farmer/Labor
Project Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.
Al Franken has refused to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2014 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests. Al Franken is still welcome to submit the test at any time.

What is the Political Courage Test?

This candidate has demonstrated 0% courage during the test.

*Note: This percentage is calculated based on the number of issue areas addressed by the candidate on the Political Courage Test at the conclusion of the testing period. It does not indicate support or lack of support by Project Vote Smart.

Issue Positions

In response to the increasing unwillingness of candidates to answer issue questions, Project Vote Smart has researched Presidential and Congressional candidates' public records to determine candidates' likely responses on certain key issues. These are provided below as a courtesy to voters.

Vote Smart's Research

Vote Smart's Research

  • "Today the Congressional Budget Office announced that the bill actually saves billions of dollars and reduces the Federal deficit. That is because the refinancing proposal is fully paid for by implementing the Buffett rule, which limits the ability of millionaires and billionaires to exploit tax loopholes and pay a lower tax rate than middle-class families." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "But Al knows that cuts and revenues alone won't fix the deficit--we need growth to get our economy going, help struggling businesses and families, and improve our fiscal outlook." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "...while Al knows that teachers welcome accountability, he also knows that the current system doesn't accurately measure a teacher's contribution--we must move to a growth model of accountability." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "The decision to permit the Keystone XL pipeline has to be based on careful evaluation of the risks and benefits of the project. And while I believe the process has taken too long, I don't believe we should simply approve the current plan without having the necessary analysis and information from the agencies reviewing it."There's no question the project would create jobs. And I believe that it could help address challenges associated with transporting oil on rail, which has been a major problem in Minnesota. But we also need to understand the full effects of the pipeline on the environment-along the route of the pipeline and on climate change."The Department of State has issued its environmental impact statement, but other federal agencies are still concluding their work. This issue is too important to play politics with, and the decision should be made with the complete information."

Vote Smart's Research

  • "The single most important action we can take to reform our energy policy and make the United States a leader in the global clean energy economy is to make polluters pay for the pollution they emit. President Obama has consistently called for establishing a price on carbon as part of any comprehensive clean energy legislation Congress passes. Putting an effective price on carbon will drive investment in clean energy technology and create the well-paid jobs that will revitalize our economy and sustain it for generations to come. A carbon price will also provide certainty in the energy market, and allow American businesses to make the investment decisions that will allow them to compete in and win the global race for clean energy technology leadership." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "I believe Minnesota has struck the proper balance, for example, by requiring background checks and live firearms training for carry permits." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "...I'm proud to have supported the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "We urge you to use the resources at your disposal to personally make clear to those seeking entry to the U.S. illicitly that they will not receive special treatment when it comes to enforcing our immigration laws." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "Al...couldn't have been prouder when Minnesota became the 13th state to enact marriage equality." (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "The government must give proper weight to both keeping America safe from terrorists and protecting Americans' privacy. But when Americans lack the most basic information about our domestic surveillance programs, they have no way of knowing whether we're getting that balance right. This lack of transparency is a big problem.Since I came to the Senate, I've been working to fix this. I've supported amendments to the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act that would have required greater public reporting on the use of surveillance authorities and greater disclosures about the legal opinions and safeguards that support them. When those amendments failed, I voted against renewing both of these laws.I want to be clear: I didn't vote "no" because I wanted to end these programs or because I thought they were unnecessary. Based on briefings, I believe these programs protect our country and have saved lives and have reasonable safeguards in place to protect Americans' privacy. I voted the way I did because I wanted to send a loud signal to my colleagues that transparency was critical and that there was too little of it in place. National security laws must protect national security. But they must also protect the public trust and preserve the ability of an informed electorate to hold its government to account" (votesmart.org)

Vote Smart's Research

  • "In good times and in bad, Social Security has succeeded in keeping millions of senior citizens...out of extreme poverty." (votesmart.org)

Key

Candidate Answer Official Position

Candidate had the Political Courage to address this issue directly.

Inferred Answer Inferred Position

Candidate refused to address this issue directly, but Project Vote Smart inferred this issue position based on the candidate's public statements, voting record, and evaluations from special interest groups.

Unknown Answer Unknown Position

Candidate refused to address this issue.

 Project Vote Smart's Research

Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position.