Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Nick Jordan's Voting Records on Issue: Business and Consumers

Office: Secretary of Revenue (KS), Republican

Kansas Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
May 7, 2008 SB 586 Incentives to Develop Nuclear Power Facilities Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(29 - 3)
May 6, 2008 HB 2412 Coal Plant Incentives Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(24 - 10)
April 30, 2008 SB 148 Electricity Generation and Conservation Veto Override Passed - Senate
(32 - 7)
April 4, 2008 SB 148 Electricity Generation and Conservation Concurrence Vote Passed - Senate
(32 - 7)
March 26, 2008 Bartlett Amnd. Bartlett Amendment Amendment Rejected - Senate
(12 - 27)
March 26, 2008 Huelskamp Amnd. 1 Employment Verification Amendment Rejected - Senate
(11 - 27)
Did Not Vote
March 6, 2008 SB 327 Expansion of Coal-Fired Power Plants Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(31 - 7)
Feb. 28, 2008 SB 501 Kansas Tourism Corporation Bill Passed - Senate
(33 - 7)
Feb. 28, 2008 SB 586 Incentives to Develop Nuclear Power Facilities Bill Passed - Senate
(32 - 8)
Feb. 14, 2008 HB 2066 Restricting the Secretary of Health and Environment's Enforcement Powers Bill Passed - Senate
(33 - 7)
Feb. 13, 2008 Steineger Amnd. Limiting Carbon Dioxide Emissions Amendment Rejected - Senate
(3 - 32)
March 28, 2007 SB 66 Kansas Expanded Lottery Act Concurrence Vote Passed - Senate
(22 - 18)
Feb. 7, 2007 SB 327 Expansion of Coal-Fired Power Plants Senate Co-sponsor
May 10, 2006 HB 2583 Machinery Tax Exemptions Conference Report Adopted - Senate
(28 - 11)

About the Selection and Descriptions of Key Votes

Project Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and State voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Key votes typically include the initial passage of legislation and final conference report vote versions (the compromised versions of bills passed in separate House and Senate versions). Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Descriptions of the votes are written by Vote Smart staff and based on information included in the Congressional Record, State House Journals, or Senate Journals, with additional background information from newspapers, magazines, etc. Vote Smart provides summaries for each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the final version of the bill.

The Key Votes Program follows Project Vote Smart's strict policies, procedures and structure that guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. In order to ensure that all Key Votes are non-partisan in their selection and language, each is approved by a group of over 160 political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top