Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Frank Antenori's Voting Records on Issue: Immigration

Arizona Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
April 19, 2011 SB 1406 Interstate Compact to Build a Border Fence Concurrence Vote Passed - Senate
(21 - 9)
Yea
April 6, 2011 HB 2191 Punitive Damage Awards Bill Passed - Senate
(21 - 8)
Yea
March 17, 2011 SB 1308 Separate Birth Certificates for Non-Citizens Bill Failed - Senate
(12 - 18)
Nay
March 17, 2011 SB 1309 Defines Arizona Citizenship Bill Failed - Senate
(11 - 19)
Nay
March 17, 2011 SB 1405 Hospital Admissions and Restrictions Bill Failed - Senate
(12 - 18)
Yea
March 17, 2011 SB 1611 Requires Verification of Citizenship for Certain Benefits Bill Failed - Senate
(11 - 19)
Yea
March 15, 2011 SCR 1035 English as the Official Language Resolution Passed - Senate
(21 - 9)
Yea
Feb. 28, 2011 SB 1406 Interstate Compact to Build a Border Fence Bill Passed - Senate
(20 - 9)
Yea
April 19, 2010 SB 1070 Expanding Undocumented Immigration Enforcement Concurrence Vote Passed - Senate
(17 - 11)
Yea

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top