Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Sheila Harsdorf's Selected Sponsorships

Office: State Senate (WI) - District 10, Republican Majority Caucus Vice Chair

Selected Sponsorships

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
March 14, 2013 AB 82 Prohibits the Unauthorized Transfer of Food Stamps House Co-sponsor
Oct. 12, 2011 AJR 63 Limits Recalls of Elected Officials House Co-sponsor
April 28, 2011 SB 13 Repealing Regulations for Telecommunications Services Senate Sponsor
March 30, 2011 AB 69 Use of Deadly Force in Self-Defense House Co-sponsor
March 22, 2011 SB 45 Administration of Medications to Students Senate Sponsor
Jan. 27, 2011 AB 7 Voter Identification Requirements House Co-sponsor
Jan. 5, 2011 SB 2 Tax Benefits for Health Savings Accounts Senate Co-sponsor
June 2, 2009 SB 223 University of Wisconsin Board of Regents Geographic Composition Requirements Senate Sponsor
Jan. 18, 2008 AB 710 Partial-Birth/Late-Term Abortion Ban House Co-sponsor
March 22, 2007 AB 205 Restrictions on Off-Reservation Native American Casinos House Co-sponsor
Feb. 28, 2007 SB 77 Financial Disclosure For Issue Based Groups Senate Sponsor
Jan. 30, 2007 AB 47 Health Savings Account Tax Deductions House Co-sponsor
Jan. 24, 2007 AB 30 Felon Employment in Educational Agencies House Co-sponsor
Jan. 16, 2007 SJR 5 Limiting Governor's Partial Veto Authority Senate Sponsor
Jan. 12, 2007 AJR 1 Partial Veto by Alteration Ban House Co-sponsor
Feb. 27, 2006 AB 1073 Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Caps House Co-sponsor
Jan. 11, 2005 SB 1 Ethics Bill Senate Co-sponsor

About the Selection and Descriptions of Key Votes

Project Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and State voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Key votes typically include the initial passage of legislation and final conference report vote versions (the compromised versions of bills passed in separate House and Senate versions). Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Descriptions of the votes are written by Vote Smart staff and based on information included in the Congressional Record, State House Journals, or Senate Journals, with additional background information from newspapers, magazines, etc. Vote Smart provides summaries for each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the final version of the bill.

The Key Votes Program follows Project Vote Smart's strict policies, procedures and structure that guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. In order to ensure that all Key Votes are non-partisan in their selection and language, each is approved by a group of over 160 political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top