Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Mark Sanford, Jr.'s Voting Records on Issue: Arts, Entertainment, and History

Office: U.S. House (SC) - District 1, Republican

National Key Votes

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
Oct. 1, 2013 H J Res 70 National Park Service Operations, Smithsonian Institution, National Gallery of Art, and United States Holocaust Memorial Museum Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2014 Joint Resolution Failed - House
(252 - 176)
Yea
July 21, 1998 H Amdt 753 National Endowment for the Arts Amendment Amendment Adopted - House
(253 - 173)
Nay
Feb. 1, 1996 S 652 Telecommunications Bill Conference Report Adopted - House
(414 - 16)
Yea
Jan. 4, 1996 HR 1977 1996 Interior Appropriations Veto Override Failed - House
(239 - 177)
Yea
Dec. 13, 1995 HR 1977 Interior Department FY96 Appropriations bill Conference Report Adopted - House
(244 - 181)
Yea
Aug. 3, 1995 H Amdt 725 Corporation for Public Broadcasting Amendment Amendment Rejected - House
(136 - 286)
Yea
July 18, 1995 HR 1977 Interior Department FY96 Appropriations bill Bill Passed - House
(244 - 181)
Yea

Executive Actions

Date Bill No. Bill Title Outcome Vote
June 25, 2010 H 3541 Relating to Bear Hunting Vetoed - Executive
Veto
June 21, 2010 H 3975 Relating to Hunters' Education Vetoed - Executive
Veto
May 12, 2010 S 481 Relating to the Certified Athletic Trainer Foundation Vetoed - Executive
Veto
June 16, 2008 S 577 Assault on Sports Officials Vetoed - Executive
Veto
June 11, 2008 H 3993 Baseball Days Vetoed - Executive
Veto
June 11, 2008 H 4815 Film Incentives Vetoed - Executive
Veto
May 28, 2008 H 3906 Baseball Days Vetoed - Executive
Veto
May 28, 2008 S 1161 Marion Court Library Vetoed - Executive
Veto
Feb. 27, 2008 H 4403 Designating the site of the Boiling Springs Geyser in Spartanburg County as a State Historic Site Vetoed - Executive
Veto
May 15, 2007 S 348 Chandler's Law Vetoed - Executive
Veto

About the Selection and Description of Key Votes

Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and state voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:

  1. The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
  2. The vote should be clear for any person to understand
  3. The vote has received media attention
  4. The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
  5. Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added

Vote Smart provides a summary of the version of the bill text associated with each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the content of the final version of the bill. Summaries are written by Vote Smart's staff and interns, who adhere to the project's strict policies and procedures in order to guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. Each key vote selection is reviewed by the project's community of advisors, who are political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.

Skip to top
Back to top