| Full Name: | Linda Black |
|---|---|
| Office: | State House (MO) - District 117, Democratic |
| First Elected: | 11/04/2008 |
| Last Elected: | 11/06/2012 |
| Gender: | Female |
|---|---|
| Family: | Husband: Jon; 2 Children: Eric, Loren |
| Home City: | Bonne Terre, MO |
| Religion: | First Baptist |
Key Votes
Representative Linda Black's Voting Records
Education
Issue
- Education down
- Abortion
- Abortion and Reproductive
- Agriculture and Food
- Animals and Wildlife
- Arts and Entertainment
- Budget, Spending and Taxes
- Business and Consumers
- Campaign Finance and Elections
- Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
- Conservative
- Crime
- Death Penalty
- Defense
- Drugs
- Education
- Employment and Affirmative Action
- Energy
- Environment
- Executive Branch
- Federal, State and Local Relations
- Foreign Affairs
- Gambling and Gaming
- Government Operations
- Guns
- Health and Health Care
- Housing and Property
- Immigration
- Indigenous Peoples
- Judicial Branch
- Labor Unions
- Legislative Branch
- Liberal
- Marriage, Family, and Children
- Military Personnel
- National Security
- Science
- Senior Citizens
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
- Social
- Stem Cell Research
- Technology and Communication
- Trade
- Transportation
- Unemployed and Low-Income
- Veterans
- Women
(clear issue)
Missouri Key Votes
| Date | Bill No. | Bill Title | Outcome | Vote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb. 28, 2013 | HB 388 | Requires School Ratings Based on Student Performance | Bill Passed - House (128 - 23) |
Yea |
| Feb. 28, 2013 | HB 34 | Authorizes School Districts To Opt Out of Prevailing Wage Requirement | Bill Passed - House (89 - 59) |
Nay |
| May 15, 2012 | SB 576 | Authorizes the Expansion of Charter Schools | Bill Passed - House (99 - 54) |
Nay |
| May 7, 2012 | Amdt 1 | Rescinds Funding for the Sue Shear Institute | Amendment Adopted - House (93 - 59) |
Nay |
| May 3, 2012 | HB 1526 | Amends Teacher Dismissal Policies | Bill Passed - House (83 - 76) |
Nay |
| April 28, 2010 | HB 2002 | 2010-2010 Education Budget | Conference Report Adopted - House (87 - 64) |
Nay |
| April 28, 2010 | HB 2003 | Higher Education Appropriations | Conference Report Adopted - House (115 - 34) |
Yea |
| March 17, 2010 | Amdt 4 | Deleting an Education Foundation Formula Modification | Amendment Rejected - House (73 - 83) |
Yea |
| May 14, 2009 | SB 291 | Education Provision Modifications | Bill Passed - House (110 - 46) |
Yea |
| April 16, 2009 | HB 668 | Firearm Regulation Amendments | Bill Passed - House (105 - 50) |
Yea |
| April 16, 2009 | HJR 32 | Bonds to Fund Higher Education | Joint Resolution Passed - House (131 - 28) |
Yea |
| March 26, 2009 | HB 2 | 2009-10 Education Budget | Bill Passed - House (92 - 64) |
Nay |
| Feb. 26, 2009 | HB 242 | Authorizing Four-Day School Weeks | Bill Passed - House (101 - 60) |
Yea |
About the Selection and Descriptions of Key Votes
Project Vote Smart provides easy access to Congressional and State voting records and maintains a collection of key votes grouped by issue. Key votes typically include the initial passage of legislation and final conference report vote versions (the compromised versions of bills passed in separate House and Senate versions). Vote Smart uses the following criteria to select key votes:
- The vote should be helpful in portraying how a member stands on a particular issue
- The vote should be clear for any person to understand
- The vote has received media attention
- The vote was passed or defeated by a very close margin
- Occasionally, if a specific bill is consistently inquired about on the Voter's Research Hotline, the vote will be added
Descriptions of the votes are written by Vote Smart staff and based on information included in the Congressional Record, State House Journals, or Senate Journals, with additional background information from newspapers, magazines, etc. Vote Smart provides summaries for each selected key vote. The summary does not necessarily reflect the final version of the bill.
The Key Votes Program follows Project Vote Smart's strict policies, procedures and structure that guarantee absolute impartiality and accuracy. In order to ensure that all Key Votes are non-partisan in their selection and language, each is approved by a group of over 160 political scientists and journalists from all fifty states.
