Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Roderick 'Rod' Wright's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2013 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 50%
2013 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 56%
2012 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 73%
2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 83%
2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 67%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 69%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 88%
2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 69%
2011 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 82%
2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 45%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 67%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 65%
2010 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 59%
2010 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 50%
2010 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 54%
2009 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
2009 California National Federation of Independent Business - State Senate Score 14%
2009 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 62%
2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 73%
2005-2010 Consumer Federation of California - Cumulative Score 64%
2005-2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 73%
2001 Alliance for Better Business - Positions 77%
2001 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 30%
2000 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 17%
2000 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 83%
1999-2000 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 27%
1998 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 36%
1998 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 82%
1997-1998 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 13%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (Senate Only) 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 89%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 83%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 50%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 89%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 78%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 88%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 79%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 100%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 97
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 13%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 47%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 30%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 89%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Green Equity Score 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Leadership Score -10%
2009 Applied Research Center - Legal Racism Score 0%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Health Equity Score 80%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Education Equity 67%
2009 Applied Research Center - Overall Score 49%
2009 Applied Research Center - Housing and Economics Score 100%
2009 Applied Research Center - Positions on Criminal Justice 100%
2001 Equality California - Positions 100%
1997-2001 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 78%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (Senate Only) 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 79%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 88%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 89%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 50%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 83%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 89%
2013 Equality California - Positions 25%
2012 Equality California - Positions 100%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 97
2011 Equality California - Positions 92%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 97%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 100%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 89%
2010 Equality California - Positions 100%
2009 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 88%
1997-2001 Gay Rights Information - Positions on LGBT Rights 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top