Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Tom McClintock's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Abortion and Reproductive

Office: U.S. House (CA) - District 4, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 4

Abortion and Reproductive

2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions (June 27, 2014) 0%
2014 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured January 9, 2014 (reflect past 6 years' voting record) 0%
2014 Population Connection - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 0%
2013 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2013 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured February, 2013 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 0%
2013 Population Connection - Positions (Sept. 2013) 0%
2012 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2012 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions captured June, 2012 (reflect voting records of past 6 years) 0%
2011 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2010 Planned Parenthood Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association - House of Representatives Score 0%
2009 NARAL Pro-Choice America - Positions 0%
2009 Population Connection - Committee Votes Score 0%
2007 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions on Reproductive Rights 0
2006 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions on Reproductive Rights 20
2005 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 11%
2004 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 20%
2003 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 0%
2002 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 10%
2001 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 13%
2000 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 0%
1999 Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California - Positions 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top