or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Tom McClintock

Tom McClintock's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Full Name: Tom McClintock
Current Office: U.S. House - District 4, Republican
First Elected: 11/04/2008
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 4
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 33%
2013 Environment America - Positions 0%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 31%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 7%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 7%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 11%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 6%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 0%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 11%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 29%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 9%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 29%
2011 Clean Water Action California - Positions (Congressional) 0%
2011 Environment America - Positions 3%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 3%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 6%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 0%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 46
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 6
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 6
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 0%
2009 Environment America - Positions 0%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2008 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 11
2007 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0
2007 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 100%
2006 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2006 Environment California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 12
2006 Sierra Club California - Positions on Environmental Conservation 0
2005-2006 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 30
2005 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2005 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%
2004 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2004 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%
2003-2004 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 22%
2003 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2003 Sierra Club California - Positions 0%
2002 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
2001-2002 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 30%
2001 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 13%
2000 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
1999 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
1998 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 0%
1997 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 9%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top