Representative Adam B. Schiff's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Adam B. Schiff
Current Office: U.S. House - District 28, Democratic
First Elected: 11/07/2000
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 28
Primary June 3, 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Eve; 2 Children: Alexa Marion, Elijah Harris
Birth Date: 06/22/1960
Birth Place: Framingham, MA
Home City: Burbank, CA
Religion: Jewish
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Immigration

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 17% 2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Legislation Evaluation (House Only) 55% 2011-2012 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 7% 2011-2012 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 68% 2011-2012 The Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans - Positions 33% 2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 25% 2009-2010 American Immigration Lawyers Association - U.S. House Score 100% 2009-2010 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 0% 2009-2010 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Positions 76% 2009-2010 United States English - U.S. House Score 0% 2007-2010 National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute - Positions 78% 2007-2008 English First - Positions on English as the Official Language F 2007-2008 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 8% 2007-2008 The American Hellenic Educational Progressive Association - Greek American Issues Score 69% 2007-2008 United States English - Positions on English as the Official Language F 2007 English First - Positions 0% 2007 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 0% 2007 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100 2006 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 50% 2006 English First - Positions 0% 2005-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 21% 2005-2006 Iranian American Political Action Committee - Positions 100% 2005-2006 United States Border Control - Positions 0% 2005 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 100% 2005 Americans for Immigration Control - Positions 0% 2005 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 57% 2005 National Council of Agricultural Employers - Positions 33% 2005 National Council of La Raza - Positions 66% 2004 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 8% 2004 National Council of La Raza - Positions 100% 2003-2006 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 10% 2003-2005 Americans for Better Immigration - Positions 8% 2003-2004 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 100% 2003-2004 United States Border Control - Positions 0% 2003 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 0% 2002 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 50% 2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 33% 2001-2002 Federation for American Immigration Reform - Positions 0% 2001-2002 National Hispanic Leadership Agenda - Positions 72% 2001 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 50% 2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50% 2001 English First - Positions 0% 1995-2004 American Immigration Lawyers Association - Positions 90% 1989-2002 Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score 21% 1989-2001 Americans for Better Immigration - Lifetime Score 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.