Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Todd Russell Platts's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Foreign Affairs

2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 4%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 15%
2012 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 17%
2012 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 20%
2012 National Journal - House Liberal (Foreign) 41%
2012 Peace Action - Positions 7%
2011-2012 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011-2012 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 0%
2011-2012 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 50%
2011-2012 USA Engage - Positions 63%
2011 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2011 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 0%
2011 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score 18%
2011 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 17%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2011 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2010 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2010 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2010 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2010 Peace Action - Positions 13%
2010 Peace Action West - Positions 13%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2009-2010 PeacePAC - Positions (PeacePAC is sister organization of Council for a Livable World rating House Only) 0%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5%
2009-2010 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 30%
2009 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2009 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 33%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2009 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 26%
2009 NewPolicy.org - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy 0%
2009 Peace Action West - Positions 8%
2009 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score 50%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues C-
2008 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score B-
2008 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 50%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2008 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 29%
2008 Peace Action West - Positions 10%
2008 Resolve Uganda - Lifetime Score D
2007-2009 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C-
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Council for a Livable World - Positions 12%
2007-2008 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2007-2008 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2007-2008 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -4
2007-2008 USA Engage - Positions on Trade and Engagement C
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions -2
2007 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score C
2007 Council for a Livable World - Positions 28%
2007 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 36%
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2007 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2007 Peace Action West - Positions 18%
2007 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2007 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2007 Voices for Creative Nonviolence - Iraq-Afghanistan Supplemental Spending Score 17%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 71%
2006 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 20%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2006 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2006 Peace Action - Positions 43%
2006 Peace Action West - Positions 43%
2006 United To End Genocide - Positions on Darfur B
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 25%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 44%
2005-2006 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 16%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -6
2005 Citizens for Global Solutions - Global Issues Score D+
2005 Council on American-Islamic Relations - Positions 0%
2005 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2005 Peace Action - Positions 17%
2005 PeacePAC - Positions 15%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2004 Latin America Working Group - Positions 14%
2004 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 17%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2004 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 33%
2004 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2003-2004 ACT! for America - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -9
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 13%
2003-2004 National Foreign Trade Council - Positions 33%
2003-2004 PeacePAC - Positions 18%
2003-2004 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -5
2003-2004 USA Engage - Positions 40%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 38%
2003 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 22%
2003 Latin America Working Group - Positions 0%
2003 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 36%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2003 Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - Positions 0%
2003 Peace Action - Positions 11%
2003 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights -2
2002-2003 Citizens for Global Solutions - Positions 8%
2002 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 50%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2002 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001-2002 American Foreign Service Association - Positions 78%
2001-2002 American Muslims for Jerusalem - Positions on International Middle East Policy Advocacy -6
2001-2002 Council for a Livable World - Positions 0%
2001-2002 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Foreign Trade Council - Postions 50%
2001-2002 USA Engage - Positions 60%
2001 Friends Committee on National Legislation - Positions 21%
2001 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 41%
2001 Peace Action - Positions 0%
2001 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 33%
1998-2002 Center for Security Policy - Positions 91%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top