or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Todd Russell Platts

Todd Russell Platts's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Full Name: Todd Russell Platts

Environment

2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 26%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 32%
2012 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean water (House Only) 7%
2011-2012 Clean Water Action - Positions 17%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 19%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 57%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 27%
2011-2012 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions (House Only) 57%
2011 Environment America - Positions 21%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 34%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 8%
2011 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions (House Only) 8
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 20%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 35%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 29%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2009 Environment America - Positions 60%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 36%
2009 PennEnvironment - Positions 60%
2008 Environment America - Positions 69%
2007-2009 PennEnvironment - Positions 60%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 84
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 84
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 69%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 58%
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 50%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 60%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 55%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 71%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 42%
2006 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 83%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 22%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 33%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 30%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 62%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 62
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 62
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 33%
2004 Center for International Policy - Positions 0%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 20%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 9%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 19%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 50%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 21%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 13%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 13%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 25%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 13%
2002 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 67%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 27%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 16%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 50%
1997-1998 Pennsylvania League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
1995-1996 Pennsylvania League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top