Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Todd Russell Platts's Ratings and Endorsements

Conservative

2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 64%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 72%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 58%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 51%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 55%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 64%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 59%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 65%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 95%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 93%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 45%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 48%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 72%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 92%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 53%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 52%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 49%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 51%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 52%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 80%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 70%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 70%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 75%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 64%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 70%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 85%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 83%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 73%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 70%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 60%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 57%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 76%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2009 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 68%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 65%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 68%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 40%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 60%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 50%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 68%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 60%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 65%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 69%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 45%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 57%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 82
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 72%
2007-2008 ConservAmerica - Positions 84
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 45%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 64%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 63%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 87
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 70%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 3%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 64%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 61.5%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 30%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 72%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 26%
2006 ConservAmerica - Positions 67
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 71%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 54.7%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 48%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 27%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 71%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 67%
2005 ConservAmerica - Positions 62
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 67%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 62%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 51%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 67%
2005 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 62%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 82%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 78%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring) 13%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 60%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 90%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 86%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 76%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 91%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 85%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 81%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 58%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 63%
2003 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer) 38%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 88%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 87%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 60%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 55%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 96%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 89%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 76%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 80%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 60%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top