Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

William Lacy Clay, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Senior Citizens

Office: U.S. House (MO) - District 1, Democratic

2014 Endorsements

Senior Citizens

2014 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 0%
2013-2014 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions (97th-113th Congresses) 100%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 97%
2013 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 96%
2012 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2011 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009-2010 Alzheimer's Impact Movement - Positions 67%
2009-2010 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 95%
2009 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2009 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2008 Alliance for Retired Americans - Lifetime Score 95%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2007-2008 The American Geriatrics Society - Elderly Health Advocacy Score B+
2007 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2006 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 90%
2006 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 78%
2006 The Retired Enlisted Association - Retired Military Benefits Issues Score 36%
2005-2006 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2005 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 90%
2005 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2004 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2004 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 86%
2003-2004 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2003-2004 Retire Safe - Positions 14%
2003 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 88%
2003 Leading Age - Positions 50%
2003 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2002 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 86%
2002 National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association - Positions 100%
2002 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 100%
2001-2002 National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare - Positions 100%
2001 Alliance for Retired Americans - Positions 100%
2001 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 91%
2000 National Council of Senior Citizens - Positions 89%
2000 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 57%
1999-2000 United Seniors Association - Positions 20%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top