Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Timothy 'Tim' L. Walberg's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Labor Unions

Office: U.S. House (MI) - District 7, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 7
Pam Byrnes
(Running)
Democratic
Kenneth Proctor
(Running)
Libertarian
Rick Strawcutter
(Running)
U.S. Taxpayers Party of Michigan
David Swartout
(Running)
No Party Affiliation

Labor Unions

2014 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0%
2013-2014 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions (House) 0%
2013-2014 Workplace Choice - Positions 80
2013 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 11%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 10%
2013 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 8%
2013 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 21%
2013 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100%
2012 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 5
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 14%
2012 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 8%
2012 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 11%
2012 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 4%
2011-2012 American Federation of Teachers - Positions 20%
2011-2012 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions (House) 100%
2011-2012 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 0%
2011 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 4%
2011 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 3%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 0%
2011 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0%
2011 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 14%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 21%
2008 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Lifetime Score 16%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Lifetime Score 6%
2008 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 14%
2008 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 78%
2008 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 0%
2008 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 60%
2008 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers - Positions 16%
2007-2008 International Foodservice Distributors Association - Positions 100%
2007-2008 United Food & Commercial Workers - Positions 13%
2007 American Federation of Government Employees - Positions 0%
2007 American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) - Positions 13%
2007 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (AFSCME) - Positions 0%
2007 Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers - Positions 25%
2007 Center for Worker Freedom - Positions 100%
2007 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers - Positions 33%
2007 International Brotherhood of Boilermakers - Positions 40
2007 Service Employees International Union (SEIU) - Positions 10%
2007 United Auto Workers - Positions 7%
2007 Utility Workers Union of America - Positions 0
1997-1998 Michigan AFL-CIO - Positions 6%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top