Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Timothy 'Tim' L. Walberg's Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (MI) - District 7, Republican
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 7
Pam Byrnes
(Running)
Democratic
Kenneth Proctor
(Running)
Libertarian
Rick Strawcutter
(Running)
U.S. Taxpayers Party of Michigan
David Swartout
(Running)
No Party Affiliation

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 67%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 84%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 88%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 72%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 60%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 69%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 86%
2013-2014 The New American - Positions (captured September 2, 2014) 53%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 84%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 94%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 86%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 77%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 87%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 96%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 85%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 81%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 87%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 78%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 95%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 95%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 83%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 96%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 97%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 61%
2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 86%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 9%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 85%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 85%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 90%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 85%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 100%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 79%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 79.5%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 66%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 90%
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 66%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 100%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 100%
2007 ConservAmerica - Positions 7
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 88%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 18%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 79.3%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 72%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 70%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top