Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Jerry N. Govan, Jr.'s Ratings and Endorsements

Office: State House (SC) - District 95, Democratic

Business and Consumers

2014 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (House Only) 60%
2013 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 63%
2012 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 18
2012 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 38%
2011-2012 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2011 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 43
2011 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 85%
2010 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 77.12
2009-2010 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 67%
2009 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 60%
2008 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 47.77
2008 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 100
2007-2008 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 100
2007 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 17.10
2006 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions on Pro-Business Policy 29.61
2005-2006 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 57%
2005-2006 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 44
2005 South Carolina Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56%
2003 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 34%
2001-2002 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 11%
2001-2002 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 0%
1997-1998 South Carolina Business and Industry Political Education Committee - Positions 44%
1997-1998 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 38%
1995-1996 South Carolina National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 28%

Socially Conservative

2013-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 23%
2013-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 23%
2012 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 13
2012 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 13
2011-2012 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 38%
2011-2012 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions 38%
2011 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 21%
2011 Palmetto Liberty Political Action Committee - Positions 21%
2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 36%
2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 36%
2007 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 49%
2007 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 49%
2005-2006 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 83%
2005-2006 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 83%
2003-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 43%
2003-2014 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 43%
2003-2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 50%
2003-2010 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 50%
2003-2004 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 30%
2003-2004 Palmetto Family Alliance - Positions (House Only) 30%
1998 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 13%
1998 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 13%
1997 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 13%
1997 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 13%
1988-1997 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 14%
1988-1997 Palmetto State Scorecard PAC - Positions 14%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top