or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

Adam Smith

Representative Adam Smith's Special Interest Group Ratings

Adam Smith
Full Name: Adam Smith
Current Office: U.S. House - District 9, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/1996
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Filter by Issue:

Budget, Spending and Taxes

2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 62%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 37%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Social Policy 62%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 29%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 38%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Economic Policy Score 71%
2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 14%
2010 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 7%
2010 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 8%
2009 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 3%
2009 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 8%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Positions 18%
2008 Citizens Against Government Waste - Lifetime Score 26%
2007-2008 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 5%
2007 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 15%
2007 FreedomWorks - Positions 10%
2006 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 14%
2006 FreedomWorks - Positions 33%
2006 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 20%
2005-2006 Citizens for Tax Justice - Positions 100%
2005-2006 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 18%
2005 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 21%
2005 FreedomWorks - Positions 29%
2005 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 18%
2005 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 77%
2004 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 40%
2004 American Shareholders Association - Positions 50%
2004 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 17%
2004 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 62%
2003-2004 FreedomWorks - Positions 27%
2003-2004 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 18%
2003 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 20%
2003 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 35%
2002 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 10%
2002 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 28%
2002 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 67%
2001-2002 Concord Coalition - Positions 94%
2001-2002 FreedomWorks - Positions 10%
2001-2002 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 12%
2001 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 35%
2001 American Shareholders Association - Positions 29%
2001 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 18%
2001 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 59%
2000 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 30%
2000 Concord Coalition - Positions 41%
2000 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 29%
1999-2000 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 41%
1999 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 30%
1999 Concord Coalition - Positions 98%
1999 National Taxpayers Union - Positions 24%
1998 Americans for Tax Reform - Positions 5%
1998 Concord Coalition - Positions 74%
1998 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 29%
1998 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 65%
1997-1998 National Tax Limitation Committee - Positions 18%
1997 Concord Coalition - Positions 64%
1997 National Taxpayers Union - Spending Score 32%
1997 Taxpayers for Common Sense - Positions 53%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top