or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Grace Flores Napolitano

Representative Grace Flores Napolitano's Special Interest Group Ratings

Grace Flores Napolitano
Full Name: Grace Flores Napolitano
Current Office: U.S. House - District 32, Democratic
First Elected: 11/03/1998
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014

Environment

2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Liberal Action Score 77%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Conservative Action Score 6%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 85%
2011 Clean Water Action California - Positions (Congressional) 100%
2011 Environment America - Positions 100%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 94%
2011 Sierra Club - Positions on Clean Water (House Only) 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 92%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Regressive Action Score 7
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 76%
2009-2010 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Progressive Action Score 59%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 96%
2009 Environment America - Positions 93%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2008-2011 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 0%
2008 Environment America - Positions 100%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 88%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 91%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 90%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 90%
2007 League of Private Property Voters - Land Rights Advocacy Score 8
2006 American Wind Energy Association - Positions 0%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%
2006 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 9%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 96%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 0%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 89%
2005 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 14%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2004 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 0%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 100%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 94%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 100%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 100%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2003 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 0%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 95%
2001-2002 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 0%
2001-2002 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2001 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 0%
2000 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 7%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 87%
1999-2000 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 87%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 81%
1999 League of Private Property Voters - Positions 18%
1997 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top