Representative Patrick Alan Nunnelee's Special Interest Group Ratings

Biographical

Full Name: Patrick Alan Nunnelee
Current Office: U.S. House - District 1, Republican
First Elected: 11/02/2010
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Republican for U.S. House - District 1
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014
Gender: Male
Family: Wife: Tori; 3 Children: Reed, Emily, Nathan
Birth Date: 10/09/1958
Birth Place: Tupelo, MS
Home City: Tupelo, MS
Religion: Baptist
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 74% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 81% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 80% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 81% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 67% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 67% 2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 74% 2014 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Positions 100 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 63% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 63% 2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 63% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 60% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 64% 2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 60% 2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 64% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 86% 2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 86% 2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 76% 2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 85% 2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 100% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 57% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 80% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 87% 2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 79% 2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 60% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 73% 2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 64% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70% 2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 70% 2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 60 2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 90% 2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 96% 2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 100% 2012 Family Research Council - Positions 100% 2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 60% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 81% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 91% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 80% 2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 86% 2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 77% 2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 78% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 67% 2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 67% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 91% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 91% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81% 2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 81% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 71% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 71% 2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 71% 2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 10% 2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 83% 2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 83% 2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 100% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76% 2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 76% 2011 Family Research Council - Positions 90% 2011 FreedomWorks - Positions 72% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 57% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 57% 2011 Heritage Action for America - Positions (House Only) 57% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 86% 2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 9% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy Score 83% 2011 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82% 2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 100% 2011 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 75% 2011 The Club for Growth - Positions 76% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 70% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 65% 2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 65% 2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 65%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.