Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Eleanor Holmes Norton's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Foreign Affairs

Office: U.S. House (DC) - Delegate, Democratic

Foreign Affairs

2013 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 80%
2012 Arab American Institute - Positions on Arab-American Issues 9%
2012 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions 46%
2011-2012 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 70%
2010 Latin America Working Group - Positions (House only) 50%
2009-2010 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2009-2010 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 1%
2009-2010 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 70%
2009 Latin America Working Group - Positions 25%
2009 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0%
2008 Armenian National Committee of America - Positions on Armenian American Issues B
2007-2008 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2007-2008 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 20%
2007-2008 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions +5
2007 Latin America Working Group - Positions 70%
2006 Latin America Working Group - Positions 10%
2006 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 50%
2005-2006 ACT! for America - Positions 0%
2005-2006 United States Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation - Positions on International Middle East Human Rights 0
2003-2004 American Security Council Foundation - Positions 0%
2003-2004 Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA) - Positions 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top