or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

[x] close
Print Track This Candidate

Eliot Glassheim

Representative Eliot Glassheim's Special Interest Group Ratings

Eliot Glassheim
Full Name: Eliot Glassheim
Current Office: State House - District 18, Democratic-NPL
First Elected: 1975
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2016

Filter by Issue:

Abortion

2005 North Dakota Right to Life - Positions 33%
2001 North Dakota Right to Life - Positions 67%

Agriculture and Food

2007 North Dakota Farmers Union - Positions 90%
2005 North Dakota Farmers Union - Positions 89%

Animals and Wildlife

2005 Nodak Outdoors - Positions 50%
2003 Nodak Outdoors - Positions 91%

Business and Consumers

2011 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 69%
2011 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 80%
2009 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 36%
2007-2008 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions on Pro-Small Business Policy 33
2007 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 73%
2005 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 43%
2005 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 36%
2003-2004 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
2003 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 56%
2001 Greater North Dakota Chamber of Commerce - Positions 71%
2001 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 50%
1999 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 78%
1997-1998 North Dakota National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 38%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2011 North Dakota Human Rights Coalition - Positions 94%
2003 Equality North Dakota - Positions 100%

Environment

2009 Dakota Resource Council - Positions 67%
2007 Dakota Resource Council - Positions 100%
2005 Dakota Resource Council - Positions 75%
2003 Dakota Resource Council - Positions 100%

Guns

2012 National Rifle Association - Candidate Positions on Gun Rights 0%
2008 National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund - Lifetime Score F
2000 National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund - Positions on Gun Rights D
1998 National Rifle Association Political Victory Fund - Positions on Gun Rights C-

Labor Unions

2009 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 66%
2009 North Dakota Public Employees Association - Positions 100%
2007 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 82%
2007 North Dakota Public Employees Association - Positions on Workplace Rights 100
2005 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2005 North Dakota Public Employees Association - Positions 86%
2003 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 100%
2003 North Dakota Public Employees Association - Positions 100%
2001 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 93%
1999 North Dakota AFL-CIO - Positions 85%
1999 North Dakota Public Employees Association - Positions 100%

Liberal

2005 North Dakota People - Positions on Responsible Government 93
2005 North Dakota Progressive Coalition - Liberal on Social Policy Score 93%

Marriage, Family, and Children

2009 Children's Defense Fund - North Dakota - Positions 100%

Social

2011 North Dakota Human Rights Coalition - Positions 94%

Women

2011 North Dakota Women's Network and the American Association of University Women - North Dakota - Positions 100
2009 North Dakota Women's Network and the American Association of University Women - North Dakota - Positions 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

2012 Endorsements

About Project Vote Smart

Help Us If You Can

Media & Communications

Education

For Candidates

One Common Ground, Philipsburg, MT 59858 Hotline: 888-Vote-Smart (888-868-3762)
All content © 1992 - 2013 Project Vote Smart unless otherwise attributed - Privacy Policy - Legislative demographic data provided by Aristotle International, Inc. Mobile Version

Back to top