Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category
 

Isadore Hall III's Ratings and Endorsements

Business and Consumers

2015 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 31%
2015 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 88%
2015 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 73
2015 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (State Legislatures) 33%
2014 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25%
2014 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 73%
2014 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 71%
2014 National Federation of Independent Business - Positions (State Legislatures) 36%
2013 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 43%
2013 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 50%
2013 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 56%
2013 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 93%
2013 Consumer Federation of California - Positions (Lifetime) 71
2013 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 75
2012 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 55%
2012 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 58%
2012 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 55%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Positions on Consumer Issues 67%
2012 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 70%
2011 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 25%
2011 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 36%
2011 California National Federation of Independent Business - Positions 30%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Lifetime Score 71%
2011 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 82%
2010 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 59%
2010 California Manufacturers and Technology Association - Positions 36%
2010 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 73%
2009 California Chamber of Commerce - Positions 46%
2009 California National Federation of Independent Business - State Assembly Score 13%
2009 California Public Interest Research Group - Positions 54%
2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 63%
2005-2010 Consumer Federation of California - Cumulative Score 67%
2005-2009 Consumer Federation of California - Positions 63%

Campaign Finance and Elections

2012 California Clean Money Action - Positions 100%

Civil Liberties and Civil Rights

2015 California Civil Liberties Advocacy - Positions 81
2014 California Communities United Institute - Positions 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (House Only) 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 98%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 89%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 95%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 94
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Economic Liberties Score 17%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Overall Score 22%
2011 Republican Liberty Caucus of California - Civil Liberties Score 29%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 98%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 93%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 93%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 95%
2009 Race Forward - Housing and Economics Score 100%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Criminal Justice 100%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Civil Rights 100%
2009 Race Forward - Legal Racism Score 0%
2009 Race Forward - Green Equity Score 75%
2009 Race Forward - Leadership Score 50%
2009 Race Forward - Overall Score 83%
2009 Race Forward - Positions on Education Equity 100%
2009 Race Forward - Health Equity Score 100%

Environment

2015 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 80%
2015 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92%
2015 Sierra Club California - Positions 90%
2014 California Environmental Justice Alliance - Positions 83%
2014 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Scores 78%
2014 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 73%
2013-2014 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 100%
2013-2014 Clean Water Action California - Positions 72%
2013 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions %
2013 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 79%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 76%
2012 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 69%
2012 Clean Water Action California - Positions 67%
2012 Sierra Club California - Positions 69%
2011-2012 California Park and Recreation Society - Positions 100%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 79%
2011 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 75%
2011 Sierra Club California - Positions 55%
2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 81%
2010 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90%
2010 Sierra Club California - Positions 80%
2009-2010 Clean Water Action California - Positions 60%
2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 71%
2009 California League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%
2009 Environment California - Positions 62%
2009 Race Forward - Green Equity Score 75%
2009 Sierra Club California - Positions 53%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

2015 Equality California - Positions 100%
2014 California Communities United Institute - Positions 95%
2014 Equality California - Positions 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Latino Issues 93%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Asians and Pacific Islanders 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on HIV/AIDS 89%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on African Americans 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on People of Color 95%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Native Americans 100%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Womens Issues 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Overall Positions (House Only) 96%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on LGBT 98%
2013 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 97%
2013 Equality California - Positions 100%
2012 Equality California - Positions 100%
2011 California Communities United Institute - Positions 94
2011 Equality California - Positions 92%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Overall Score 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Women's Issues Score 95%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Minority Issues Score 98%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Intersex Score 93%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on Economic Justice 94%
2010 California Communities United Institute - Positions on AIDS Policy 93%
2010 Equality California - Positions 100%
2009 Equality California - Positions on LGBT Rights 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top