or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Janice Hahn

Janice Hahn's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Conservative

Full Name: Janice Hahn
Current Office: U.S. House - District 44, Democratic
First Elected: 07/12/2011
Last Elected: 11/06/2012
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House - District 44
General Nov. 4, 2014
Primary June 3, 2014

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 14%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 14%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 10%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 12%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 6%
2013 Competitive Enterprise Institute - Workplace Choice (August, 2013) 0%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 FreedomWorks - Positions 24%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 21%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 16%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 6%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Social Policy 16%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions 12%
2013 The Club for Growth - Positions (lifetime) 12%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 35
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 0%
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 0%
2012 Catholic Advocate - Positions 0%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2012 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2012 FreedomWorks - Positions 21%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Composite Score) 12%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Foreign) 22%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Economic) 0%
2012 National Journal - House Conservative (Social) 0%
2012 National Taxpayers Union - Positions on Tax and Spending 15%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 12%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 32%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 32%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 9%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 17%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 9%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 17%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 16%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 16%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 20%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 20%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 20%
2011-2012 Irregular Times/Progressive Patriots/That's My Congress - Net Congressional Score 58%
2011-2012 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 Christian Coalition of America - Positions 0%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 33%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 33%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2011 Family Research Council - Positions 0%
2011 National Right to Life Committee - Positions 0%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 25%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 25%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top