Senator Floyd McKissick, Jr.'s Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: State Senate (NC) - District 20, Democratic Deputy Minority Leader
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for State Senate - District 20
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Environment

2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 78% 2015 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 100% 2014 Environment North Carolina - Positions 76 2013 Environment North Carolina - Positions 92% 2013 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 86% 2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Positions 75% 2013 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90% 2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 74% 2012 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50% 2011 Environment North Carolina - Positions 78% 2011 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 83% 2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50 2011 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 72 2010 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 84% 2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 38% 2009-2010 Environment North Carolina - Positions 72% 2009-2010 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 64% 2009 Environment North Carolina - Positions 75% 2009 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 88% 2009 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 90% 2008 Environment North Carolina - Positions 100% 2008 Environment North Carolina - Lifetime Score 95% 2007-2008 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions 92% 2007 Environment North Carolina - Positions on Environmental Conservation 90 2007 North Carolina League of Conservation Voters - Positions on Environmental Conservation 83

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.