Senator Margaret 'Lynne' Pancrazi's Special Interest Group Ratings

Office: State Senate (AZ) - District 4, Democratic Assistant Minority Leader
View 2014 Endorsements
Filter by Issue
How To Interpret These Evaluations

Conservative

2013 Goldwater Institute - Positions 42% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 21% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 79% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 21% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 7% 2012 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 14% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Education 0% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 30% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Tax and Budget 7% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Regulation 7% 2011 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Constitutional Government 0% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 43% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 39% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 52% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 35% 2010 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 35% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Total Score 35% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 24% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 39% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 34% 2009 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 57% 2008 Americans for Prosperity - Arizona Chapter - Positions on Conservative Issues 5 2008 Goldwater Institute - Regulation Score 34% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Positions on Conservative Issues 34 2008 Goldwater Institute - Constitutional Government Score 25% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Education Score 44% 2008 Goldwater Institute - Tax and Budget Score 31% 2007 Goldwater Institute - Positions 34%

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.