Search Form
Now choose a category »
 

Mary L. Landrieu's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Animals and Wildlife

Office: U.S. Senate (LA) - Sr, Democratic
On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. Senate

Animals and Wildlife

2014 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2013 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 67%
2013 Animal Welfare Institute - Compassion Index 75%
2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2013 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2012 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 67%
2011-2012 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 85%
2011 American Veterinary Medical Assoctiation - Positions on Professional Advocacy 100%
2011 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 100%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2009-2010 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 56%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 67%
2009 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 50%
2008 Sportsmen and Animal Owner's Voting Alliance - Positions 0
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 18%
2007-2008 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions on Animal Protection 67%
2007-2008 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 67
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2007 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions on Animal Protection 75
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2005-2006 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 60
2005-2006 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 60%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 25%
2005 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40%
2004 American Humane Association - Positions 20%
2004 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 20%
2004 Born Free USA - Positions 20%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2004 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 20
2004 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 20
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003 American Humane Association - Positions 20%
2003 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 20%
2003 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 20%
2003 Born Free USA - Positions 20%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 27%
2003 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 20%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 20%
2003 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 20%
2003 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 20%
2001-2002 American Humane Association - Positions 25%
2001-2002 American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals - Positions 25%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Born Free USA - Positions 25%
2001-2002 Doris Day Animal League - Positions 25%
2001-2002 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 25%
2001-2002 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 25%
2000 Animal Welfare Institute - Positions 25%
2000 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 40
1999-2000 The Humane Society Legislative Fund - Positions 40%
1999 The Humane Society of the United States - Positions 25%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top