or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mary L. Landrieu

Mary L. Landrieu's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Full Name: Mary L. Landrieu
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/1996
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Announced, Democratic for U.S. Senate
Primary Nov. 4, 2014

Environment

2013 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2013 Environment America - Positions 50%
2013 Food Policy Action - Positions 50%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 69%
2013 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 51%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2012 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 49%
2011-2012 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 86%
2011-2012 Environment America - Positions 50%
2011-2012 Food Policy Action - Positions 67%
2011-2012 League of Conservation Voters - Session Score 64%
2011 Environment America - Positions 72%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 82%
2011 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 49%
2010-2011 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 100%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 29%
2010 League of Conservation Voters - Lifetime Score 47%
2009-2010 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 40%
2009-2010 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 67%
2009-2010 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 67%
2009 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 67%
2009 Environment America - Positions 86%
2009 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 91%
2008 Environment America - Positions 40%
2007-2008 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 18%
2007-2008 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 54%
2007-2008 The National Mining Association - Positions 50%
2007 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2007 League of Conservation Voters - First Session Score 53%
2006-2012 Global Exchange - Percent Loyalty to Finance, Insurance, Real Estate Lobby 50%
2006 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 43%
2005-2006 American Forest and Paper Association - Positions 71%
2005-2006 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
2005-2006 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 16%
2005-2006 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 20%
2005-2006 Partnership for America - Positions 70%
2005 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 25%
2005 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 50%
2005 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 66%
2004 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 50%
2003-2004 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11%
2003-2004 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 0%
2003-2004 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 32%
2003-2004 National Parks Conservation Association - Positions 60%
2003-2004 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 73%
2003 American Lands Alliance - Positions 11%
2003 Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund - Positions 27%
2003 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 21%
2003 Sierra Club - Positions 20%
2001-2002 American Wilderness Coalition - Positions 20%
2001-2002 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Women's Action for New Directions (WAND) and-WILL - Positions 53%
2001 Californians for Population Stabilization - Positions 0%
1999-2000 American Lands Alliance - Positions 0%
1999-2000 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 44%
1999 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 22%
1998 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 80%
1997 League of Conservation Voters - Positions 71%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top