or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Mary L. Landrieu

Mary L. Landrieu's Ratings and Endorsements

Full Name: Mary L. Landrieu
Current Office: U.S. Senate - Sr, Democratic
First Elected: 11/05/1996
Last Elected: 11/04/2008
Next Election: 2014
On The Ballot: Potential, Democratic for U.S. Senate
General Dec. 6, 2014
Primary Nov. 4, 2014

Conservative

2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (Jan. 7, 2014) 19%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score 21%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Positions (June 23, 2014) 17%
2014 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime Score (June 23, 2014) 20%
2014 Heritage Action for America - Positions (Jan. 9, 2014) 3%
2014 The John Birch Society - Positions 16%
2014 The John Birch Society - Lifetime Score 20%
2013-2014 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 7%
2013-2014 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 20%
2013 American Conservative Union - Positions 12%
2013 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2013 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy 34%
2013 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy 43%
2013 National Journal - Conservative (Composite) 42%
2013 The John Birch Society - Positions 30%
2013 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 16
2012 American Conservative Union - Ratings of Congress 16%
2012 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 21%
2012 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Foreign) 40%
2012 National Journal - Senate Conservative (Composite Score) 45%
2012 The Club for Growth - Positions 16%
2012 The John Birch Society - Positions 25%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Lifetime score 22%
2011-2012 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 23%
2011-2012 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 28%
2011-2012 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011-2012 Heritage Action for America - Positions 11%
2011 American Conservative Union - Positions 10%
2011 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 21%
2011 Concerned Women for America - Positions 0%
2011 Eagle Forum - Positions 0%
2011 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 47%
2011 National Journal - Liberal on Foreign Policy Score 52%
2011 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 39%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Spring-Summer) 30%
2011 The John Birch Society - Positions (Summer-Fall) 20%
2011 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 20%
2010 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
2010 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 22%
2010 Eagle Forum - Positions 14%
2010 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2010 National Journal - Conservative Composite Score 36%
2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (May 2010 - September 2010) 10%
2009-2010 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 15%
2009-2010 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009-2010 Concerned Women for America - Positions 3%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2010 4%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Session) 5%
2009-2010 The John Birch Society - Positions (November 2009 - June 2010) 0%
2009 American Conservative Union - Lifetime Score 23%
2009 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2009 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 0%
2009 Eagle Forum - Positions 15%
2009 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 0%
2009 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 39%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (January 2009 - June 2009) 0%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (Full Year) 6%
2009 The John Birch Society - Positions (June 2009 - November 2009) 13%
2008 American Conservative Union - Positions 32%
2008 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2008 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 49.3%
2008 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 40%
2007-2009 The New American - Positions on Conservative Issues 26%
2007-2008 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 29%
2007-2008 Campaign for Working Families - Positions on Conservative Issues 44
2007-2008 Concerned Women for America - Positions 46%
2007-2008 The John Birch Society - Positions 26%
2007 American Conservative Union - Positions 40%
2007 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 33%
2007 Eagle Forum - Positions 75%
2007 GOPUSA - Positions 20%
2007 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2007 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 46.8%
2007 The John Birch Society - Conservative Index Score 44%
2006 American Conservative Union - Positions 24%
2006 Americans for Prosperity - Positions 14%
2006 Eagle Forum - Positions 22%
2006 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 42.5%
2006 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 44%
2006 The John Birch Society - Positions 21%
2005-2006 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 44%
2005-2006 Concerned Women for America - Positions 67%
2005 American Conservative Union - Positions 44%
2005 Eagle Forum - Positions 25%
2005 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 42%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 43%
2005 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 38%
2004 American Conservative Union - Positions 32%
2004 Christian Action Network - Lifetime Score 58%
2004 Eagle Forum - Positions 40%
2004 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 42%
2004 The John Birch Society - Positions (Fall) 30%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 16%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America - Positions 36%
2003 American Conservative Union - Positions 20%
2003 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 11%
2003 Concerned Women for America - Positions 22%
2003 Eagle Forum - Positions 20%
2003 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 32%
2003 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 39%
2002 American Conservative Union - Positions 35%
2002 Eagle Forum - Positions 33%
2002 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 46%
2002 National Journal - Composite Conservative Score 43%
2002 The John Birch Society - Positions 20%
2001-2010 Keep America Safe - Positions 52%
2001-2002 Campaign for Working Families - Positions 20%
2001-2002 Concerned Women for America - Positions 38%
2001 American Conservative Union - Positions 28%
2001 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 43%
2001 The John Birch Society - Positions 42%
2000 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
2000 Concerned Women for America - Positions 43%
2000 National Journal - Conservative on Foreign Policy Score 31%
2000 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%
1999 American Conservative Union - Positions 4%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 22%
1999 National Journal - Conservative on Economic Policy Score 42%
1999 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%
1998 American Conservative Union - Positions 8%
1998 National Journal - Conservative on Defense/Foreign Policy Score 36%
1998 The John Birch Society - Positions 5%
1997-1998 60 Plus Association - Positions 40%
1997-1998 Concerned Women for America - Positions 25%
1997 American Conservative Union - Positions 16%
1997 The John Birch Society - Positions 10%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Project Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top